Good expert analysis here. “The six reactors at ZNPP are not at all like the Chernobyl reactor & cannot, CAN NOT, have the same kind of accident. Chernobyl had a graphite moderator & the building it was in was not the heavily reinforced concrete of…ZNPP”
Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="640" height="426"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![David Watson 🥑](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="96" height="96"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Reply
"that's impossible"
impossible tend to find a way
youtube.com
Shcherbina flexing his newfound knowledge on nuclear reactors...
Show replies
Astonishing that people are lessening the impact of a likely deliberate 
atrocity. shouldn't be doing whatever it is doing at a nuclear facility. It is irresponsible, yet many appear to be accepting. With the west timid towards allows it to behave this way.
atrocity. shouldn't be doing whatever it is doing at a nuclear facility. It is irresponsible, yet many appear to be accepting. With the west timid towards allows it to behave this way.What’s astonishing is that people object to scientists clarifying the science and puncturing false claims. This article - if you bother reading it - makes clear that Russia is being irresponsible.
Yeah. These "experts" have been minimising the ongoing catastrophe at Enerhodar since before 27th February 2022 when Russia started attacking it.
They serve a market for people who want to feel good about the first, most brutal, and longest military occupation of a nuclear… Show more
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="680"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="329" height="360"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="461"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="900" height="237"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Quote Tweet
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
DecodïngTrolls
@DecodingTrolls
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="240" height="163"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="360" height="95"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="360" height="87"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
1/ As @OSCE Environment Security adviser for Zaporozhzhia,first warned Black Sea powers on 2nd Mar an armed attack impacting the viability of the Black Sea was taking place at Enerhodar 
plant.
150+ forcible disappearances of engineers, elected officials & grisly torture... twitter.com/DecodingTrolls…
plant.
150+ forcible disappearances of engineers, elected officials & grisly torture... twitter.com/DecodingTrolls…Here is my estimation about Zaporizhzhia power plant disaster
I had taken a course of nuclear engineering when I was in College
Quote Tweet
Cheng-Wei Lai
@ChengWeiLai2
Replying to @ChengWeiLai2
Since I took one course of nuclear engineering when I was in college, I was asked by a Ukrainian friend to estimate the radiation range in case the Zaporozhye nuclear power station was destroyed. There are ten pictures, please refer to each language version.
Highlights:
… Show more
… Show more![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="383"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Show replies
Correct, but there is a lot of bad outcomes between 0 and a Chernobyl-2.
Nobody thinks ZNPP is in danger of having "the same kind of accident". Demolition is a different kind of purposeful act.