Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="573" height="679"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="396"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="545" height="900"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![David Watson 🥑](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="96" height="96"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Reply
The whole deal is that theoretically it has to be approved, it's fully in compliance with all the new state housing initiatives, but obviously San Francisco is fighting it. So who knows!
Show replies
This skyscraper is legit 10x better than all the decades-old buildings around it. Wraparound balconies, modern insulation & amenities, a massive roof deck, and magnificent views of the Pacific Ocean? Absolutely stunning.
