Tweet

See new Tweets

Conversation

Matthew Yglesias
@mattyglesias
They sincerely should offer the option of subscribing to a special edition of the New York Times that appends (“… and this is bad”) to every headline that’s about the actions of GOP elected officials or conservative activists. A lot of people seem to want this.
Quote Tweet
Jay Rosen
@jayrosen_nyu
I wish I subscribed to a New York Times which led with the fact that Republicans in Congress have no grounds on which to impeach Biden (but they want to anyway...) instead of a New York Times focused on divisions among them and assorted maneuvers therein. nytimes.com/2023/07/04/us/
from Centreville, VA
448K
Views
48
Retweets
7
Quotes
803
Likes
16
Bookmarks
David Watson 🥑
Reply
Ira Goldman 🦆🦆🦆
@KDbyProxy
Do NY Times' readers need that? Is it not enough for their articles to be written for who they know their readers to be, or must each article include all the backstory a reader would need if having just awakened from a 30-year coma?
Image
3
12
3,453
Garrett Wollman
@garrett_wollman
Nah. I'd be happy with a Times that showed a greater consistency in discerning the true from the false, and perhaps some understanding of the phrase "undue weight".
1
8
1,442
Ryan
@ryananderson3
also suggests that a news desk at jacobin would do insane numbers, which we all know it wouldn't. people just like complaining
1
2,545
constans
@constans
The Times is perfectly happy to have articles about why something is harmful and so on when they want to
4
1,907
Miss Norma Jeane 🗽🇺🇸🩸 🦷 🏴‍☠️
@rosanthony3
I know you’re being snarky but I think he has a point: The NY Times is treated this like a sport and deflecting from dealing with whether the GOP’s impeachment has any merit NYTimes could attack this head on by sharing the facts that make up the basis of the investigation and…
4
27
3,454