Post

Conversation

David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

I never understood what the ROI is supposed to be on those ads. Targeting the 1 in 100,000 people that see the poster and have some brand recognition when they're making budget decisions etc. It doesn't really add up.
The most expemsive ad buys are at Pentagon and Capitol South. My personal favorite was 'you can't trust a project as important as the joint strike fighter to a songle supplier.'
I think it is targeted at potential employees as well. I think it leaves anyone who might have to interact with, or consider, work by General Atomics with a good feeling about their work.
Mass transit is not popular at Wright-Patterson AFB so they have a large billboard on the roads as you get on base used by all the aerospace contractors.
Pentagon, Crystal City and Federal Triangle opened in 1977 but it was decades before we saw such ads. Such a failure of imagination by the advertising industry!
1. GAA could probably tell you the exact names and commute routes of those specific targets. 2. Please, please, please tell me that there aren’t national security and defense officers scanning random QR codes in public adds. I’m begging you. 🙏
Yes it’s a pretty niche audience, though it does go a bit beyond a small handful of Air Force procurement officers: congressional appropriators and overseers, OMB, DoD civilian and military leadership, defense and acquisition policy communities.
It's also a jobs advert. Lockheed, Northrup do it too. "Hey, young engineers in DC/NOVA, we have big gov contracts where we make cool stuff, come work for us."
I liked the metro adds when the LCS was being bid out in the early '00. As if I was going to call up LockMart and buy one.
when I was a kid ('90s) in the DC area there were routinely ads for fighter jets on the radio. It was very weird.
The ads inside the Pentagon are absolutely wild. Wall-to-wall wraps for Raytheon or Lockheed.
kind of a positive sign about on-line ad targeting if they have to resort to this (or maybe those people in particular are just hard to target)
Large procurements have a lot of eyes on them. I think this is more than just procurement officers who they are targeting. Hill staffers where oversight hearings are held are also targets along with OMB. Though still very much a DC thing.
Yep! When I first visited Washington DC, I was shocked by the ads in the metro. Just Defense contracts and contractors.
You shall know a city by its billboards. DC: "Check out this new weapons system" New Orleans: "Debauchery this way!" SF: "Our SaaS tool is just the best" Miami: "Check out this new $100k watch!"
Same in Canberra, you get to the airport and all the ads in the baggage claim are for Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman.
The US Air Force's budget for the Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program is as follows:  • FY 2024: $661 million  • FY 2025–2029: $8.9 billion • FY 2025 RDT&E: $557.1 million
I saw that ad yesterday. At least similar ads on BART are trying to get *private corporations* to spend millions of dollars on unproven technology for mission-critical systems.
Just had a tough call with my campaign team. Larry Hogan and his far-right allies launched an $18 million ad blitz against me, so we’re ramping up our digital efforts, even if it means spending faster than we planned. Will you donate to help us win this battleground Senate race?