Post

Conversation

The Senate Banking Committee just unanimously passed a big, bipartisan housing bill. My newsletter today takes an in-depth look at the supply portions of the bill. Some of the highlights 🧵
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

A lot of the bill involves shifting existing federal grants to pro-supply localities. To wit, it folds in Rep. Scott Peters’ perennial idea to send more federal transit dollars to jurisdictions that have looser zoning rules around planned rail and bus lines. 1/x
Image
Another interesting idea is a proposed “innovation fund” which reads like an attempt to get ‘YIMBY grants’ right. Unlike the current PRO grants, which is basically just a subsidy for studies and plans, this would reward localities that are actually growing supply. 3/x
Image
Image
Also grouped in there is the white whale of chassis reform, NEPA exclusions for federally subsidized infill housing, and a plan to have HUD produce model zoning codes. 4/x
Image
Image
All told, it’s a bill of a million tweaks. It notably does not include more aggressive proposals to directly preempt local zoning or spend billions more on affordable housing. 5/x
Image
As a libertarian to be sure, I’m wholly in agreement with the idea that the feds shouldn’t be involved in housing at all. But since they are, reforming existing programs to encourage more local/state deregulation is an acceptable second-best approach. 6/x
Image
Image