Post

Conversation

Previous Americans leaders have all understood that while Hollywood would love to dismantle protections for French-language content, this would involve breaking the basic compact underlying Canadian political stability in exchange for trivial economic gains.
Quote
Dan McLaughlin
@baseballcrank
I get being mildly annoyed at this, but why would it be any policy concern of ours? Do we complain about the Mexicans speaking Spanish? The Quebecois aren't some immigrant group 'invading' Canada, they've been there longer than the English speakers. x.com/JewishWarrior1…
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

Did not appreciate the depth of feeling on this until I saw that even the graffiti in the line for a rollercoaster observes the bilingual mandate
Image
Thank you. Check out "October Crisis" in Wikipedia to find out how bad it got. Bilingualism was a big part of how we pulled ourselves back from the abyss and survived as a nation. Strange as that might seem. It's worth fighting to preserve.
“Trivial economic gains” could define the entire clusterfuck Trump decided (on a whim) to create. It’ll take generations to earn back this trusted ally that would’ve been there for us to the bitter end. For what? So we can sell them our milk?
On the other hand, most Anglo Canadians would be quietly very grateful if the US gave us an excuse to ditch equal prominence labeling, supply management, French content rules in media, etc. Like, please be the bad guy so we don’t have to.
Why not just make the Quebecois learn English? Or divide up Canada into two countries? There no reason for us to participate in the fiction of Canuck bilingualism.
I grew up in Western Canada. I went through two Quebec referenda. The Québécois are incredibly annoying. And I fully support walking away from the deal if the Americans were trying to undermine the French language