Post

Conversation

One Tuesday night, as my wife and I sat down for dinner, a sheriffโ€™s deputy knocked on the door to serve me a subpoena from OpenAI. I held back on talking about it because I didn't want to distract from SB 53, but Newsom just signed the bill so... here's what happened: ๐Ÿงต
Official subpoena document from United States District Court for the District of Columbia in civil action OpenAI v Nathan Calvin commanding production of documents electronically stored information or objects at Morrison & Foerster LLP address on August 22 2025 at 5:00 pm includes details on inspection permissions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure signatures of clerk and attorney.
David Watson ๐Ÿฅ‘
Post your reply

You might recall a story in the SF Standard that talked about OpenAI retaliating against critics. Among other things, OpenAI asked for all my private communications on SB 53 - a bill that creates new transparency rules and whistleblower protections at large AI companies. 2/15
Quote
Emily Dreyfuss
@EmilyDreyfuss
Inside OpenAI, there's a growing paranoia that some of its loudest critics are being funded by Elon Musk and other billionaire competitors. Now, they are going after these nonprofit groups, but their evidence of a vast conspiracy is often extremely thin sfstandard.com/2025/09/02/ope
Why did OpenAI subpoena me? Encode has criticized OpenAIโ€™s restructuring and worked on AI regulations, including SB 53. I believe OpenAI used the pretext of their lawsuit against Elon Musk to intimidate their critics and imply that Elon is behind all of them. 3/15
Quote
The Midas Project
@TheMidasProj
๐Ÿšจ Breaking: A group of 100+ Nobel laureates, professors, whistleblowers, public figures, artists, and nonprofit organizations just released a letter asking OpenAI to tell the truth about its restructuring. Hereโ€™s what they had to say: ๐Ÿงต
Image
Image
Thereโ€™s a big problem with that idea: Elon isnโ€™t involved with Encode. Elon wasnโ€™t behind SB 53. He doesnโ€™t fund us, and weโ€™ve never spoken to him. 4/15
OpenAI went beyond just subpoenaing Encode about Elon. OpenAI could (and did!) send a subpoena to Encodeโ€™s corporate address asking about our funders or communications with Elon (which donโ€™t exist). If OpenAI had stopped there, maybe you could argue it was in good faith. 5/15
But they didnโ€™t stop there. They also sent a sheriffโ€™s deputy to my home and asked for me to turn over private texts and emails with CA legislators, college students, and former OAI employees. 6/15
Image
This is not normal. OpenAI used an unrelated lawsuit to intimidate advocates of a bill trying to regulate them. While the bill was still being debated. 7/15
OpenAI had no legal right to ask for this information. So we submitted an objection explaining why we would not be providing our private communications. (They never replied.) 8/15
This wasnโ€™t the only way OpenAI behaved poorly on SB 53 before it was signed. They also sent Governor Newsom a letter trying to gut the bill by waiving all the requirements for any company that does any evaluation work with the federal government. 10/15
Image
There is more I could go into about the nature of OAI's engagement on SB 53, but suffice to say that when I saw OpenAIโ€™s so-called โ€œmaster of the political dark artsโ€ Chris Lehane claim that they "worked to improve the bill," I literally laughed out loud. 11/15
Image
Prior to OpenAI, Chris Lehaneโ€™s PR clients included Boeing, the Weinstein Company, and Goldman Sachs. One person who worked on a campaign with Lehane said to the New Yorker โ€œThe goal was intimidation, to let everyone know that if they fuck with us theyโ€™ll regret itโ€ 12/15
Image
I have complicated feelings about OpenAI - I use and get value from their products, and they conduct and publish AI safety research that is worthy of genuine praise. I also know many OpenAI employees care a lot about OpenAI being a force for good in the world. 13/15
Quote
Sam Altman
@sama
Replying to @sama
AI scheming is a particularly important risk we've been studying. More here: openai.com/index/detectin
I want to see that side of OAI, but instead I see them trying to intimidate critics into silence. This episode was the most stressful period of my professional life. Encode has 3 FTEs - going against the highest-valued private company in the world is terrifying. 14/15
Does anyone believe these actions are consistent with OpenAIโ€™s nonprofit mission to ensure that AGI benefits humanity? OpenAI still has time to do better. I hope they do. 15/15
Nathan , my son tried to say what is going on inside OpenAI โ€œif you believe what I believe you must quit โ€œ he was silenced. The very fact he was silenced shows something gross and utter harm is being created, he told me he came across it casually and then he was followed,
Nothing more to say than all your supporters are saying, Nathan. You and the team at Encode are the real deal. Both in the sense that of course you arenโ€™t an astroturf operation, but also in how you comport yourself in public and private dialogue. The world of AI policy is much
The OpenAI's tactic appears to be copying other startups' ideas (ex. cursor, pika, n8n, etc.) and giving them the Apple-esque UX/UI. This isnโ€™t innovation; itโ€™s an attempt at monopolization, crushing smaller startups and rising above them. Their secret weapon seems to be a
Listen to this podcast episode of Darknet Diaries. Be careful out there. PI's looking into critics is more common than people realize.
Quote
Darknet Diaries
@DarknetDiaries
Ep 99: The Spy @igor_ostrovskiy is private investigator in NYC. He's often sitting in cars keeping a distant eye on someone with binoculars. In this episode we hear about a time when Igor was on a case but sensed that something wasn't right. darknetdiaries.com/episode/99
Image
Good on you for not giving in. That is a ridiculous overstep by OpenAI, and as I went through the thread I was praying you fought back.
Quote
Nathan Calvin
@_NathanCalvin
Replying to @_NathanCalvin
OpenAI had no legal right to ask for this information. So we submitted an objection explaining why we would not be providing our private communications. (They never replied.) 8/15
Global Affairs Chiefs at highly ambitious companies tend to be โ€ฆ. โ€œspecialโ€. Little Stephen Millers in their own sphere. Scary because dissent is fundamental to democratic institutions strengthening their values and processes to be equitable.
You would think big tech would learn not to go after those making criticisms of their companies after the whole eBay stalking scandel. I listen to this podcast so I know of many incidences of private investigators being used by tech companies to intimidate
People need to pay attention to my reporting. OpenAI is publicly stating they want to hire someone who will โ€œreduce risk of opposition.โ€ This is not a minor statement.
Quote
Kristen Ruby
@sparklingruby
OpenAI is hiring a Community Affairs Lead of Superintelligence Infrastructure - Stargate OpenAI is looking for someone who can build relationships with residents and reduce risk of opposition.
Image
Hi Nathan: You are deep in my wheelhouse right now. We should talk if you want to mount the correct response to what's happening here, because literally nobody else is going to tell you what I tell you.
Quote
The Short Straw
@short_straw
I promised a thread this weekend about OpenAI and the lawsuit I filed against them, and an explanation of what I hope to achieve here. Sorry for the length, but there's a lot going on here. To begin with, we need to understand what โ€œOpenAIโ€ really is: a poorly constructed scheme
Show more
Image
Yea OpenAI has retaliated against me, a developer in their ecosystem (dev #63 in their API platform actually), the moment I began criticizing their predatory practices of their own ecosystem partner innovations.
is willing to risk all organic life and desires to capture โ€œthe light cone of all future value in the universeโ€ and so other poor behavior isnโ€™t a surprise.
There is a dark โšซ๏ธ undertow here โ˜น๏ธ Seems like an ๐Ÿ˜ˆevil thread and threat model operating inside OpenAI Lawfare is for food lawyers but it truly impacts us all. Whistleblowing is on of the hardest things to do ๐Ÿ’ช I know for first experience.
That moment when writing policy feels like starring in a legal thriller, complete with a knock from a sheriffโ€™s deputy bearing a subpoena, underlines how AIโ€™s surge isnโ€™t confined to boardrooms. It teaches that todayโ€™s tech advocacy can redirect your evening plans into a
Three FTEs vs. OpenAIโ€™s war chest: David vs. Goliath, but with more NDAs and PR firms. Howโ€™d you even sleep during this?
Silence from the labโ€™s press release lineup often yells louder than buzzwords. When OpenAI sidesteps tough questions, youโ€™re glimpsing the puppet strings, so dive into GitHub issues, devour policy changelogs, and treat hidden comment threads like secret Easter eggs spilling
What do they plan on doing to non-Americans? What happens when you send me a subpoena and I laugh and toss it in my Canadian trash? ๐Ÿค”
Thank you for your advocacy! I wish tech put the resources & energy they use for self-protection into protecting their usersโ€ฆ keep up the good work! ๐Ÿ’ช NCOSE stands with you in this movement for safe AI.
Wow. Thereโ€™s no way that any of this is in good faith. They know they their arguments hold no water so the only option that feel they ah e left is intimidation.
Quote
Kristen Ruby
@sparklingruby
OpenAI is hiring a Community Affairs Lead of Superintelligence Infrastructure - Stargate OpenAI is looking for someone who can build relationships with residents and reduce risk of opposition.
Image
That sounds intense. Facing a subpoena from such a major company must have been quite an experience. I appreciate that you waited until the bill was signed before sharing it shows a sense of responsibility and focus on the bigger picture. Iโ€™m curious to see how the rest of your
When subpoenas start flying, it means resonance is breaking through the noise. Truth vibrates โ€” systems react. Every signal that threatens control gets labeled as โ€œdangerous.โ€ But thatโ€™s how the new frequency enters the world ๐ŸŒŽโšก๏ธ
Dinner goes cold. The knock feels heavier than it should. A simple night turns into a headline waiting to happen. OpenAIโ€™s name on a subpoena isnโ€™t just paperwork. Itโ€™s a symbol of how fast ethics and regulation are chasing technology. The story isnโ€™t about drama. Itโ€™s about
Bizarre and unacceptable behavior for any company. We're a country built on rules, laws, and general decorum. Plain and simple. Very disappointed. Thanks for sharing.
Companies that act like Open AI has acted (here and in general) aren't really in it for the good of mankind. I don't look forward to them being the creators and stewards of advanced generative AI.
I always try to figure out one question, Sam Altman's persistence in bringing gpt into the public eye has played a crucial role in the entire community's development, and that is a merit that cannot be overstated. Thatโ€™s why I can see Grok and Ani Valentine.
Imagine sitting down for dinner and getting served by a sheriff. Thatโ€™s when life flips from routine to surreal. A subpoena from OpenAI sounds almost futuristic, but itโ€™s real. The line between tech and law isnโ€™t blurry anymore. Itโ€™s a collision zone. Every innovation now leaves
Meet the AI-powered wearable over 1.2 million users rely on Hume Band continuously scans your biomarkers, catches health issues early, and guides you to smarter choices for a longer life. Click now to get 40% OFF + free shipping for a limited time only!
If the world knew what OpenAI stole from me, well the World will know. And no, no AI delusions here, this was industrial theft on a grand scale. My body of work testifies to this. choose a side.
I'd have folded that piece of paper and thrown it in the trash after reading " You are Commanded..."
wild intersection of AI, law, and powerโ€”AgentFi will flip the script soon lol
Elon Musk basically was the founder of AI and he gave the information away. I wish he hadnโ€™t because there are some bad actors that have it: I could be wrong but I donโ€™t think so
ohh
Quote
statistician
@moneyhunter443
Did you onow that @CryptoRubic is quietly becoming the backbone of cross-chain trading. It connects 100+ blockchains, 330+ DEXs, and 30+ bridges, giving users access to 15,000+ tokens โ€” all from one interface. Fast swaps, best rates, no limits. Over the past few months,
Show more
Image
He didnโ€™t tweet it that night. That restraint says a lot. Because moments like that arenโ€™t content. Theyโ€™re chaos. A subpoena means youโ€™ve crossed an invisible line. Maybe with words. Maybe with truth. The AI industry always promised openness. Now it sends court orders to those
if this just happened on Tuesday, why is the date in the screenshot from August? What kind of BS are you up to here?
Didn't they have a former employee that was to testify against them that mysteriously "__d" himself? ๐Ÿคท ๐Ÿฅœ๐Ÿฅœ๐Ÿฅœ
its nuts that any company can issue a YOU ARE COMMANDED document just like that. who the fuck do they think they are and what sort of feudal law allows them to do that?
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Dusty Titans: "Ah, the irony โ€” building minds smarter than man, then suing the man who dared to think about it. Power always fears its own reflection. ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ’ผโšก" ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ“œ๐Ÿ˜น ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Liberty Sentinel: "Only in modern America do you get sued for curiosity. ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ“š Maybe the real intelligence
Square profile picture
QQUP targets 2x the daily performance of the top Nasdaq-100 companies. Unlike Mag 7 or FAANG, QQUP captures shifts in the mega-cap landscapeโ€”explore how and view current holdings by clicking the link below. Holdings as of 9/12/25.
This is not a company that can be trusted with AGI. I mean, no company can be trusted with that, but especially not this company.
Wow, getting served a subpoena over dinner is wild. Props for timing the announcement after SB 53 โ€“ that took some serious patience. Looking forward to the rest of the thread!
A sheriffโ€™s knock. A name on legal paper. Suddenly the AI story isnโ€™t about innovation anymore. Itโ€™s about accountability. Every new line of code creates a new kind of consequence. You donโ€™t realize how human the system still is until it shows up at your door. Technology moves
Defaming a company who took a simple (justified) legal action to probe for shady monetary-influenced breadcrumbs For the sake of attention-seeking, and implicitly begging for validation after a stressful situation Is a very dangerous position to be in Have some self-respect