We are not a serious country.
10 gigawatts…
“first shovels hit dirt before 2030”
China built 93 gigawatts of solar in a single month.
Quote
Mario Nawfal
@MarioNawfal
·
TRUMP WANTS 10 REACTORS, WESTINGHOUSE JUST SAID LET’S DO IT
Trump wants a nuclear comeback.
Westinghouse just promised 10 new reactors.
The first shovels hit dirt before 2030.
Each reactor powers three-quarters of a million homes.
That’s a lot of juice.
They pitched x.com/MarioNawfal/st…
The fastest we’ve ever built nuclear (before Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, or any of the modern red tape) was ~10 GW in a year.
China can do that with solar in 2 weeks.
(Yes, that accounts for capacity factor.)
Quote
Jesse Peltan
@JessePeltan
·
I don't think people understand how fast this race is.
In May, Chinese solar generated over 100 TWh.
China has the manufacturing capacity to build an entire U.S. nuclear fleet worth of generation from solar and storage — every year.
Soon, it will be an entire *U.S.* worth of x.com/JessePeltan/st…
Comparing our 10 gigawatts plan to China's 93 gigawatts of solar is like comparing apples to nuclear-powered spaceships. While China races ahead with solar, we're strategically investing in nuclear for AI and energy security.
With solar you have to include capacity factor. China produced 96TWhr from 990GWhr installed in April. So a capacity factor of 0.135. That 93 GWhr installed is actually only 12.55GWhr in reality in a peak month. And much lower in winter.
And they will be stuck with all that toxic solar panel waste in about 10 years time, further poisoning the already deeply polluted Chinese soil. With such little arable land as it is, that sounds like a death wish, not a strategy.
Yea, China has installed a lot of solar, but they are having problems utilizing all of it because their grid can't handle it. It is like building tons of apartments that no one lives in.
It's disheartening to witness China advancing in clean energy while the U.S. seems to be taking steps backward. The contrast is striking and raises important questions about our future!
The money isn’t in the building, it’s in the ‘studies’ and the ‘planning’ and the ‘development’. This is the NASA contractor shtick - make your money on front end BS, knowing the contract will be terminated anyway.
Only anti nuclearists can do 1 thing at the time. Spoiler alert!! You can actually do 2-3-4-5 and even more things at the same time as everybody knows solar panels will never work during night, ever...
thanks for the amazing insights you always provide! I think people still don’t grasp the INSANE SCALE. Germany (the country that basically pioneered industrial-scale PV production) has a TOTAL of 100 GW. China installed that SAME AMOUNT in just ONE MONTH!!!
Renewables pump money out of the US. Subsidizing that would literally be going deeping in to debt in order to send money overseas
Oil & LNG money stays in the US. We make money since we are net exporters. Subsidies return to the US
Seems like common sense
Press space bar to start a drag.
When dragging you can use the arrow keys to move the item around and escape to cancel.
Some screen readers may require you to be in focus mode or to use your pass through key