Post

Conversation

David Watson ๐Ÿฅ‘
Post your reply

Classic correlation vs causation misunderstanding. Obviously, if you are not healthy in the first place you donโ€™t want to have sex nor are you as attractive. You should have more sex, though.
This study is actually very solid โ€” and the longevity angle is even stronger than most people realize. Having sex 1โ€“2 times per week (or more) is associated with significantly better cardiovascular health, lower blood pressure, improved heart rate variability, and reduced
Our summary of this paper โ€” PMID: 39738405
Quote
openscience | studies, simplified
@openscience_ink
1/ Sexual frequency follows a U-shaped curve with health outcomes โ€” both too little and too much appear linked to higher risks of heart disease and death. A new paper tracked 17,243 American adults for nearly 9 years to map this relationship. A short thread:
Image
If this is โ€œmedical advice,โ€ Iโ€™m just following doctorโ€™s orders. ๐Ÿ˜Œ Cardio is important. So is commitment to the data. Science says 1โ€“2x a week. Who am I to argue with peer review? ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ”ฅ
The media could not be played.
Predictive nomogram based on sexual frequency! Developed a tool to predict survival rates using sexual frequency as a key variable. 3, 5, and 10-year survivalpredictions! This means sexual frequency is a genuinely useful predictor of longevity.
Image
Image
I wouldnโ€™t say that lack of regular sex is a cause, but rather a symptom. When people are out of shape, sedentary, and develop health problems caused by poor lifestyle choices, it can result in lower sex drive, sexual dysfunction, inability to tolerate sustained rigorous physical
Do they break down what type of sex is significantly more effective than the other? If gay sex is the best, what does that suggest for straight men? Follow the science for the sake of health?
Thatโ€™s probably due to them being less attractive
Iโ€™d imagine the fats are just having less sex as a factor of being fat In shape? More sex