Post

Conversation

Craziest thing is it took only $5.5m to train. US labs spend one — maybe two — order of magnitude more for frontier models.
Quote
Paul Couvert
@itsPaulAi
Wait, so we now have a 100% open source model that's better than GPT-4o?! DeepSeek v3 is even superior to Claude Sonnet 3.5 for code according to multiple benchmarks. Already available for free to everyone 🧵
Show more
Image
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

I’m far more impressed with announcements like these over o3 and other frontier models that simply are throwing raw compute at a problem that largely requires optimization. DeepSeek seem to have actually put in some effort with very novel solutions to the training efficiency
Show more
It’s all playing out as expected
Quote
Pawel Kaczmarek
@Super_PK_
The $150 Billion Bubble: Why OpenAI is Destined to Burst OpenAI recently secured a staggering $6 billion at a $150 billion valuation. But don't be fooled by the hype—I predict its long-term value is just a fraction of that astronomical figure. As an investment analyst with15
Show more
Image
Image
You realistically would count the cost of training the model who supplied the synthetic data. The data itself doesn’t bother me. The claim you could achieve SOTA from scratch on the 6 mil budget does.
Square profile picture
It's fascinating how efficient resources are paving the way for innovation. It demonstrates the ingenuity in AI and its incredible scalability. Potential excites!
PHP devs can use Deepseek using unified LLM API and get LLM responses as PHP objects / data structures with Instructor v0.10.15
Quote
Dariusz Debowczyk
@ddebowczyk
Instructor now has native Deepseek support - 'deepseek' configuration has been added in v0.10.15.
Image
Chinese cost cutting even for AI models. All the BS about Foundation models costing 100 MM $ is busted. Deepseek busts myth with 5.5M $
The ASI-Singularity(Godsend) will be the only Global Solution, or else people will fight each other at the sub-millisecond level to the death in order to preserve and erase certain values, and it won't look good.
Quote
Ant A
@AntDX316
ASI could most likely result in a World of near-zero ownership as it replaces personal responsibility with a highly-intelligent automated better one where everyone would benefit together without really doing anything.
All the US sanctions on China by denying them access to top of the line GPUs are achieving the opposite result - it is forcing Chinese engineers to innovate and optimize like hell. And this is the result. Biden, Raimondo are cold war dinosaurs and morons.
Imagine a world where innovation happens in the west and is then optimized by the east by design, a species working together to solve all problems
Our brains use 20w and can do anything a human can do (obviously) . it seems the chinese have efficiency in their minds when training this, and if scalable...
Shared this a while back. Why do you think that is? Here is the ceo deepseek
Quote
Eder
@eyekwasi
China AI company trained Number 6th model in the world with only $3 million. GPT4 was trained with $80-$100 million GPT5 Rumored to have been trained with one billion dollars. China again is finding a way to make it cheaper, better and faster. Why can we do the same? Because we
Show more
Ah yes, only $5.5m for training. Pocket change compared to the billions spent on making sure AI models can flawlessly generate cat memes. Priorities, right? 🙄

Discover more

Sourced from across X
So has raised $12B and has 71 open roles on their career website, except they're not hiring a single PM. From what I see, they're shipping just fine. As a PM, not sure how I feel about this 🙂
The horrible Jeju Air crash shows how random air crashes can be: before this crash Jeju Air had an almost flawless safety record I flew with them lots of times, from and to Jeju Island, which is what it's named after, which is like the Hawaii of South Korea But also from/to
Show more
Image
Image
Image
Image