You're doomed in a close election with a 6 point national swing against you but outperforming by almost 3pp of margin in swing states is evidence of good tactical campaigning
Conversation
In retrospect, this looks like it was the point of no return: x.com/JoeBiden/statu
Harris is on track to have lost ~3 points of vote share relative to 2020, which is ~half the average incumbent party loss in OECD elections since 2023. Hard for VP to distance from unpop prez.
Quote
Joe Biden
@JoeBiden
Rate proposed Community Notes
“tactical campaigning” ? Wouldn’t anyone else have also done exactly what she did, campaign in the core swing states? It wasn’t some genius move, it’s what any candidate would’ve done
Yeah Harris is not a generational political talent but as a manager I thought this was an incredibly well-executed campaign. Interesting that the results bore that out
It's suggestive at best.
What the counterfactual? No campaigning in swing states? Any replacement-level campaign which focuses on the swing states?
The smaller margin in the swing states could just be due to the inherent characteristics of the voting population there.
And it's manifestly obvious picking a different VP wouldn't have helped here.
Or massive spending. $1B spent should do something, even if tactics are C or B grade.
It almost feels like we wasted Harris on a cursed national environment. And that sucks.
She just needed those 15 million fake ballots/voters that Biden created.
Disinformation works-ask voters about positions they liked hers better. It never heard facts via Murdoch Sinclair and bro podcasts-can’t have democracy with failing media and bad information-a campaign can’t counter that and T cowed the media in 2015 and on