body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using x.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2025 X Corp.

To view keyboard shortcuts, press question mark
View keyboard shortcuts

Post

Conversation

Imagine how dumb the California legislature would look today if Newsom had signed SB 1047 last fall instead of vetoing it.

Imagining that should really only impact your assessment of Newsom, not of the California legislature, since in both cases the legislature passed it.

Agree. I actually think that the SB 1047 experience left me with a more negative opinion about the California legislature than of SB 1047 or Scott Weiner.

In particular, the fact that it's apparently common for legislators to wave through bills they don't understand in the hopes that the governor will veto them if they're bad seems really broken to me.

1:02 PM · Jan 27, 2025

215

Views

David Watson 🥑

Post your reply