Post

Conversation

introducing: Loophole - an agentic system that translates your natural language moral beliefs into codified laws, and then runs adversarial agents that try to come up with legal scenarios that break your laws - either a scenario that is immoral and legal, or vice versa - a judge agent fixes the law if it can do so consistently, but if there is an inconsistency you as the user must decide what is best. you can work with the system until your legal framework can't be broken by the agents - and you get as output a legal system that is aligned with your moral code more details and code below
Image
Image
Image
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

I was thinking the other day about how there can be things that are illegal, despite feeling totally moral, or vice versa - and how this is somewhat the result of laws needing to be general and robust enough, because nailing down edge cases exhaustively is too hard AND/OR there
This is amazing and so needed. There is a legal loophole in the moving industry. >You hire a moving company to drive your belongings across the state >Sales rep gives you a quote, say $1200, but in the fine print, the price can change at any time >The movers load up your
Very cool! I have been noticing a trend, at least among those my age, that morals are being substituted for legality for a bunch of reasons but i think mainly people dont take the time to even think about such concerns
Why limited to 'moral' codex? What about governance patterns etc? Would be a great use case similar logic. Will take a look, very interesting for large enterprise.
I love this idea so much. It would be fun to see if at some point you could also deploy this same loop to try and simplify the resulting code — trying to make your moral code more parsimonious, basically. But definitely will be checking this out tonight.