I'm more sympathetic than most people here to the idea that newspapers shouldn't endorse candidates. But is the message clear enough to have an impact? The AIs sort of tease them out, but also get a little confused.
Post
Conversation
Views on the mayor of NYC might be the single place I actually want to listen to what the NY Times has to say
I don’t get why they just didn’t endorse Lander other than to punish him for his strategic alignment with Mamdani
Like the plot to a dystopian movie, New York will now monitor social media writings, collect data, and use law enforcement to crack down on any expression it deems to be hate speech.
Rate proposed Community Notes
Journalists (more accurately, editors) used to attempt for an informal “Chinese wall” between news and opinion
This breakdown means readers should simply treat everything as opinion, and we’re all worse off for it. It’s a shame journalism decided professionalism wasn’t important
Why do people think it is socially acceptable to post AI analysis of things? If I wanted this, I’d ask AI to do it myself
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Discover more
Sourced from across X
Offered 8yo $2/day to get her little brother out the door for school. She turned around and offered him $1/day to be easy to get out the door, and today offered him an additional $1 to undergo training which will make him easier to get out the door in the future
everybody knows "people use new tech for porn/horny" is a thing but "people use it for divination/spooky/woo" is probably just as much of a thing
probably the largest-ever IQ gap between a podcast host and guest
So the guy who can singlehandedly set US tariffs on smartphones is launching his own US smartphone company do I have that right