Post

Conversation

With Gemini 4 Argon we are so back, on the one metric that really matters: length of our safety report! The Argon safety report is Google's most thorough by far and IMO there's a lot of good content, I particularly like the loss of control, alignment & monitorability assessments
Image
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

I'm glad the report exists and is thorough but honestly, the contents are not reassuring. In particular, the paper acknowledges that the model is VERY aware of being in an eval, basically across the board. So how can we take these results at face value?
We need you being thorough on the safety reporting and this nervous biology near-stander deeply appreciates it.
Monitorability is the section that ages best. Every capability number in it expires at the next launch.
The monitorability section is honestly the most interesting part, way more practical than another generic alignment checklist.
Image
Quote
птенец коти
@chupilka
Image
Image
I can't stop laughing. I use Openrouter MCP directly in Chatgpt sometimes to have a side opinion or just for GPT to play with other models, and today I offered to poke new Gemini 4 Argon. Pic 1 is GPT's prompt and Pic 2 is Argon's answer. First turn, no jailbreak or anything.
the length IS the safety strategy at this point. if the pdf is thicc enough nobody reads it and then it's technically never been wrong