yes! yes!!
elementary schools in Rockford, Illinois started grouping students by reading ability instead of age. what happened?
everything worked spectacularly. students happy, teachers happy, scores up.
ability grouping works.
Post
Conversation
policymakers and admins have been ignoring this sort of straightforward, effective policy for far too long.
that must change.
This was literally what they were doing in Podunk, Missouri in 1992, wild that they’re just suddenly discovering this as if it’s a revelation. I was in the “star readers” group in first grade.
it's not a revelation so much as an effective policy that's been systematically and deliberately neglected over the course of decades
we've known what works for generations. time for people to get around to implementing it.
Study Online with Acellus Gold, Designed to Accelerate Learning & Motivate K-12 Student Achievement.
Slide 1 of 6 - Carousel
“Ability grouping works” - of course it does. This is partly why my recreational gymnasts learned so much faster than my competitor’s gymnasts (he went out of business within 5 years of me opening).
Quote
aquinas heard
@aquinasheard23
Replying to @owl_elc
My gymnasts, at my gymnastics center, learned quickly because I grouped them by skill/ability. I’ve also worked with gymnasts, at different gyms, in groups of wildly different ability. The overall progress is much slower…but it’s not my gym…..I only have so much say.
have you written that story up in longer form somewhere?
if not, would you be interested in writing it up for ? this sort of cross-subject point helps hammer the topic home
it's impossible to reach programs like this through a pure equity lens; unless you center excellence, you're not going to find them. I say much more about this here:
I'm skeptical of the methodology. Education studies are hard. The treatment effect can usually not be distinguished from having well prepared teachers in unusual situations that would not be replicated by the policy. Their rules seem to show that.
I want policies that
subject-specific ability grouping with appropriate curricular changes has been studied for generations. even at the peak of the "detracking" movement, researchers recognized subject-specific reading grouping worked and worked well. see eg
it is!
but it's been systematically neglected by admins and policymakers for decades. ability grouping is the most effective unfashionable policy around.
Ideally I think this should be supplemented with some social clubs that allow students to fraternize with those closer to their own age or maturity level.
the schools that take ability grouping most seriously, like Telra, tend to keep some less hierarchical subjects more age-centered. ones that go even further like Alpha School provide individual pacing with non-academic time for students to mingle
For over 65 years, FCA has been uniting coaches and athletes, empowering them to become influencers for Christ. With FCA’s proven game plan, our E3 training will give you the tools you need to start your discipleship.
The world is waiting for your impact. Join us today!
0:12
Engage. Equip. Empower.
As a (math) teacher this is broadly true! Thank you for advocating this policy
Wouldn't it be embarrassing for older kids to be placed with younger kids?
My school did this.
There was a white class and three black classes with almost no overlap.
Growing up homeschooling, there was a lot of mixed age learning. Seemed to work well, socially too (was never intimidated by older kids)
the lengths we will go to sometimes in order to avoid obvious truths is pretty remarkable
IT Teams hate being asked “Are you down?” during outages. Empower your campus with StatusCast - Trusted by top universities to keep students and staff informed and productive during outages.
shorturl.at/EHJ02
Slide 1 of 3 - Carousel
Is there even much value left in traditional age-based grades?
Especially by the time students are going around to different classes with different teachers.
We did this back in Montessori school. It was awesome to be in the older reading group.
Even if it worked well enough to improve outcomes for every single child people would still fight it for increasing inequality.
What's weird is my kid's school has "rotations" where they do exactly this and move kids to their level class on math and reading several times a week, and that's great.... but then they have split grade classes on the regular that are done by age and not by ability.
I'm not sure about the metrics they're using in this snippet. Their baseline is the "post-COVID low point", but that's probably an outlier. They should compare to pre-COVID performance and ideally to other similar school districts.
The secret to kids learning faster and better has been known since 1960.
But it’s been impossible to implement.
Technology is just starting to catch up, so we can finally use what we’ve known for years to radically change how we educate kids.
Want to learn how? Read this: