Post

Conversation

Hard to overstate how revelatory this paper was for me — one takeaway I had from it was "small fixed costs can really deter people from optimizing." Which made me think about a few other recent papers where fixed optimization costs are a key ingredient:
Quote
Brian Albrecht
@BrianCAlbrecht
Prospect theory is wrong as a theory of choice between lotteries. And we've already had the evidence for decades! A new paper by Bouchouicha, Oprea, Vieider, and Wu shows how 🧵dropbox.com/scl/fi/y0spy1g
Show more
Image
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

2) Default asset allocations in 401(k) plans can have a huge effect on households' stock/bond allocations: typical HH shares of wealth in the stock-market might be ~10-20pp higher if 401(k) defaults were target date funds rather than money market funds
Quote
Tim de Silva
@timdesilva
❗️A 🧵 on my NBER WP paper with @TahaChoukhmane ❗️ Draft: tinyurl.com/47mt6m2k More details: ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Image
4) Two recent papers have fixed costs of wage adjustments, which help rationalize why workers dislike inflation and why workers' real wages fell in the recent inflation episode: x.com/JADHazell/stat nber.org/papers/w33233?
Quote
Joe Hazell
@JADHazell
🚨 New paper🚨 Why do people hate inflation? One reason is 𝘄𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀. With awesome coauthors @jptguerreiro, Christina Patterson, @ChenLian92. Paper: jadhazell.github.io/website/draft_ Great companion thread: x.com/otis_reid/stat 1/
Show more
In the original tweet in this thread I referenced the wrong paper — meant to quote tweet this one!
Quote
Brian Albrecht
@BrianCAlbrecht
People were quite interested in the paper on Prospect Theory. Here is another one by Oprea you should know. Behavioral anomalies we attribute to risk (probability weighting, loss aversion) look like responses to complexity, not risk. Forget all the talk about lotteries. x.com/BrianCAlbrecht…
Show more
Image

Discover more

Sourced from across X
"Pursuit of top-5 publications has become the obsession of the next generation of economists. However, the T5 screen is far from reliable. A substantial share of influential publications appear in non-T5. Reliance on the T5 to screen talent incentivizes careerism over creativity"
Image
There is a widespread notion that men are more ambitious than women. But this new paper finds no significant gender differences in goal setting or goal pursuit suggesting that gender disparities in outcomes in educational or professional contexts stem from other factors.
Image
All-female-authored papers are less likely to be accepted at economics conferences than all-male papers even when adjusting for... 1. the number of authors on a paper, 2. referees' traits, 3. subfield, 4. # of cites, 5. previous record of the authors, 6. connections
Show more
Image
Do coordination failures constrain financial technology adoption? In my paper last month's American Economic Review, I explore this using the Mexican gov's rollout of debit cards to low-income households and look at effects on retailers and other consumers 🧵 1/N
Image
Quote
AEA Journals
@AEAjournals
Forthcoming in the AER: "Financial Technology Adoption: Network Externalities of Cashless Payments in Mexico" by Sean Higgins. aeaweb.org/articles?id=10