This is key. If the Times et al plan to cover hacked Trump emails differently from hacked Clinton emails, fine. But then they owe the public a detailed mea culpa for their conduct in 2016, including transparency over how and when they decided they were wrong.
Quote
Scott Lemieux
@LemieuxLGM
Replying to @LemieuxLGM
If there's now a consensus that the coverage of the hacked emails was in fact seriously botched in 2016, it sure is "interesting" that 1)this consensus was apparently reached in private and 2)conveniently revealed only when it would favor Trump rather than his opponent
Most relevant