Post

Conversation

This woman is very impressive but rather than use mentats for this, we ought be revisiting the restriction on police use of facial recognition software.
Quote
Metro Transit Police
@MetroTransitPD
Officer K. Fields is known as a “super recognizer.” Now she’s being recognized for her impeccable photographic memory which has helped her identify more than 1,000 people, leading to numerous arrests. Watch the full story here: m.youtube.com/watch?si=5AU5y
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

I'm unaware of any blanket restriction on police use of facial recognition, including in D.C. Some jurisdictions have restricted or banned it in response to pressure but there is nothing legally stopping Metro Transit Police from using it that I'm aware of.
The Glenn Greenwald/Edward Snowden era of crying about “mass surveillance” during the Obama years was a huge negative in hindsight. It’s obvious that surveillance powers for the police like what this woman can do with her mind, would cut crime.
There are huge constitutional issues surrounding facial recognition technology, particularly when it comes to public surveillance (as opposed to like at the airport).
While I don’t like crime, I do think if we are identifying and catching too many Luigi Mangione style high profile criminals, it indicates that we are over-surveilled. When was the last time a crime with that level of profile went unsolved?
I don't want the FBI reading my emails or cameras installed in my house, but I never really understood the hesitation to use technology to do things that police officers are allowed to do. If you can place a cop on a street corner, you should be able to place a camera there too.
what should be the threshold for facial recognition software to trigger an arrest? 90%? 95%? 99%? Should facial recognition alone be sufficient to arrest an individual?
They are using/will begin using facial recognition on Metro. As of June it has not been in use. Although I don’t think facial recognition is a good thing, at the very least with live video feeds. You’re just spying on everyone at that point.
Quote
Ray Train
@RayTrainToTrop
I’m in favor of banning people but using AI to enforce it is not the way, @wmata.
LEOs are using FLOCK cams to ID cars by plate across the US, w/ access to one large database. A CA LEO can track a suspect's car in FL. No expectation of privacy. Faces probably aren't different. The questions: 1)how long data stored, 2) are queries logged for LEO accountability
Id argue the idea of not leveraging massive computing power to investigative tools in order to avoid dystopia is actually an implicitly foundational value in civil liberties discourse
It's very important that law enforcement be somewhat incompetent because I do not trust the government to define crime in a way I agree with in all circumstances.
Especially because we already have complete surveillance but by companies like Meta for their own commercial interests only
I don't enjoy saying this, but our knee-jerk aversion to any tech that could even potentially be used for creepy purposes is just not going to be a viable long-term strategy, and causes blind spots even now
How we assess the false positive rates is most of the issue for facial recognition aoftware.
The problem with facial recognition software wasn't the idea of matching photographs but interconnecting all sorts of cameras set up for other legitimate purposes creating a surveillance state, and concerns about efficacy in addition to privacy.

Trending now

What’s happening

Trending in United States
Alana
Trending with Gala
36.4K posts
Politics · Trending
Krasnov
6,791 posts
Entertainment · Trending
Hila
5,112 posts
Politics · Trending
#TACOTrump
4,715 posts