Conversation
Post your reply
If the article really is AI generated (Pangram has a <1% false positive rate) then I think the Guardian's editorial code requires it to signal this to its readers, and probably issue a correction for not having run one in the first place. I have emailed their readers' editor.
Maybe rather than being AI-generated, these authors' works are just so central to the training of most major models that they define the AI style that Pangram et al. check for.
... Is that worse? I think that's worse.
Oh maaaaaan, I didn’t even read it bc I rolled my eyes too hard at the headline, wish I had so I could’ve been first to realize it was slop
More like AI embraced Piketty, and when Is ay embraced I mean absorbed
Maybe they were distracted by doughnuts, "doughnut economics", an economic model that balances between essential human needs and planetary boundaries
I don’t believe you. AI is way too smart to posit “manufactured poverty.”
I think we should distinguish between original AI text creation without any prior human thought, where all the thinking and creation is outsourced to the machine, and optimising a text for smoother reading. I think the latter is the case here. Do you find that objectionable?
...and for adding a new terrifying phrase to the English language
"We economists have done the maths..."
A less than 1% false positive seems unlikely. The highlighted text reads like an excerpt from any Piketty work. "We live in an age of manufactured scarcity" is probably like a DSA T-shirt at this point.
He wants degrowth the start with the mind and he is leading by example.
It's a pity the authors didn't run the actual report through a frontier AI model. They could have saved themselves a lot of embarrassment.
Claude Fable 5 absolutely savaged the report's basic reasoning and methods:
Quote
Adam Dorr
@adam_dorr
Claude Fable 5 review of The Global Justice Report (Piketty et al. 2026)
The following is a peer-review by @claudeai Fable 5 of the new report by @PikettyWIL et al.
Verdict: reject.
Ironically, if the authors were not so arrogant or technologically illiterate, they would...
I'm actually kind of surprised that AI would be cool with generating a sentence that features two colons: "It is the exact opposite: over 18 months, more than 400 people – UN agencies, national governments, academic experts, civil society organisations, trade unions, social and
Hive analyzed this post using Hive's AI / Deepfake detection models.
" is this AI generated" to check any content!
hivedetect.ai/dxGHDG
AI Generated Image: 0%
Deepfake: 0%
hivedetect.ai/59la90
AI Generated Image: 4%
"But look at how much global poverty has decreased"
"You're right to push back—"
Actually, Sam, I really do feel you should stop applauding and start working on your grovelling apology prior to withdrawing from public life forever.
Quote
Avraam Jack Dectis
@ADectis
Replying to @TheStalwart
Pathetic failurism, they should know better.
Growth is the only strategy, far from doomed.
There is no other option Between abundance and this:
x.com/ADectis/status
Maybe it is AI drafted but based on genuinely well researched prompt?
ED affects every kind of relationship. You don't have to wait.
Clinically proven. Doctor designed. Built for both of you.
50% off this Summer Sale. HSA/FSA eligible.
