Bill of the day: New Hampshire HB 342 from (D) & (R), which requires contextual zoning for minimum lot size and lot coverage. Towns can't ask a property to be less dense than the 90th percentile in a 1,000-foot radius.
Conversation
![David Watson 🥑](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="96" height="96"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Post your reply
Contextual regulation is among my favorite ideas for what-we-should-do-instead-of-zoning, ; will like this idea too.
gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/bi
Discover more
Sourced from across X
I really appreciate all of the kind messages and concern.
But don’t worry about me, or my animals, and certainly not my house. I would rather you focus all of your thoughts on these heroic firefighters and first responders who are fighting an impossible battle around the clock.
Over Brentwood now. The fire retardant in red is toxic. Please wear masks and limit your exposure to the particles. Toxic materials from dry walls and even potential asbestos from old pipes…so please take exposure to this air seriously.. materials are carcinogenic..stay safe
Rate proposed Community Notes
Only visible to contributors
While Phos-Chek can cause mild irritation, it is known to have low toxicity to humans with no evidence of it being carcinogenic.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phos-Chek
fs.usda.gov/rm/fire/wfcs/d…
Is this proposed note helpful?
Rate
Law enforcement sources have been raising the alarm about the Laken Riley Act for this reason.
If there are two people, one arrested for shoplifting and one for murder, and ICE only has enough manpower to arrest one of them, the law requires them to arrest the shoplifter first.
Quote
Bridget Cambria
@BridgetCambria8
Well yes, if you are *mandated* to arrest people who *have not actually committed or been convicted of a crime,* you will have to release those who *actually have been convicted of a crime.*
The laws are already extremely harsh. ICE can detain any undocumented person they want. x.com/stefwkight/sta…
Show more
Longtime conservative podcaster/freelance journalist here. 
It’s okay to NOT interview Andrew Tate. He’s repulsive and hardly a paragon of masculinity.
You don’t have to platform someone because big accounts are doing it.
Use journalism for good causes—not creeps.
It’s okay to NOT interview Andrew Tate. He’s repulsive and hardly a paragon of masculinity.
You don’t have to platform someone because big accounts are doing it.
Use journalism for good causes—not creeps.