Post

Conversation

A curious correction from Axios: “Editor’s note: This story has been corrected to reflect that Tulsi Gabbard, director of national intelligence, did not attend the meeting.” So, the president and his entire national-security team gather for a high-stakes meeting, almost certainly knowing that a massive Israeli airstrike against Iran is days away, and the U.S. director of national intelligence isn’t invited? What does that tell us? Maybe someone in the Trump inner circle doesn’t want to trust Gabbard with the knowledge that an Israeli strike against Iran is imminent? nationalreview.com/the-morning-jo
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

To be fair, what does she really bring to the table? It’s not like they can’t get the info they need from other people.
U.S. Allies have not been sharing as much intelligence since tulsi took over. Again she is in a literal cult, no one trusts her.
Gabbard should have been no where near any part of the US national security apparatus, let alone appointed DNI. The President might as well have appointed Tucker Carlson.
Atlas: “I was sitting across from Anthony Fauci in August of 2020, and he looked at me and said, ‘One of the biggest problems is the American public is not afraid enough.’ This was the task force… it’s a completely unethical way to do public health.”
Oh wow, are they LEARNING? I do have questions about the rest of them, too, but Ms. Gabbard so obviously works for foreign adversaries that it's not even funny.
She did say a few weeks ago that the IC had concluded Iran did NOT have a nuclear weapons program and had not had one since 2003.
The exclusion of Gabbard from such a critical meeting suggests a lack of trust in her judgment on sensitive Israel-Iran policy matters.
Or, she might be the one person who pushes back as she posted here on ‘X’ (in 2020) something like, ‘anyone who wants to war with Iran is a warmonger’. 🤷‍♀️ I think she’s a terrible DNI but that’s just because I’m educated. Maybe she’ll change my mind someday. ⭕️
People should have paid more attention to Trevor Loudon and what he said about her. He's done his homework.
She needs to go. Along with the rest of the national security team. We already know Hegseth is a walking talking security threat with a complete misunderstanding of his job. Rubio has sold out his principles. Both of his envoys display only fielty to Trump with complete
She's a leftist isolationist. Never should have been appointed. Her comment ls after Trump's Al-Soleimani hit were disqualifying. WWIII she screamed! And of course the Iranians just hid in fear.
When genius appears in the world, you may know it by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against it. -Swift This thread indicates Tulsi is on the right side of history.
Silly question perhaps, but an important distinction - not invited or didn’t attend (but invited)? Is there confirmation that she wasn’t invited other than her non-presence?
He doesn’t care about her opinion.
Quote
Republicans against Trump
@RpsAgainstTrump
Q: Tulsi Gabbard testified in March that Iran wasn’t building a nuclear weapon. Trump: I don’t care what she said. They were very close to getting a nuke.
0:06
Quote
dan linnaeus
@DanLinnaeus
POTUS: “I don’t care what Tulsi says.” “We’re looking for better than a cease-fire,” said Trump aboard Air Force One on the way back to D.C. from the G7 early Tuesday morning, at about 5 a.m. EST. Asked whether the United States can defeat Iran’s deeply buried nuclear sites, he
Show more
Didn’t Trump say on the plane ride back to DC, that he didn’t care what Tulsi said about Iran not building nuclear weapons? God knows why he appointed her. Sounds like she’s on her way out.
Well, on his mad dash retreat from embarrassment yesterday, he literally said, "I don't care what she said," about Tulsi.🤷🏼‍♀️
She's a deranged lunatic and has been for her entire political career. She shouldn't be DNI, and Trump made a serious mistake appointing her to appease the isolationists within his base.
If she truly believed she deserved to be at that meeting she has to resign. This was an insult at the highest level. If she doesn’t resign it means she’s staying on solely to scrape as mulch top secret info as possible
Or - based on Trump statements - the DNI is relying on actual intelligence reports that disagree with the narrative Trump wants and he - in his own words - doesn't listen to her
Well, it reinforces the idea that her Hiroshima pronouncement was keyed to trying to dissuade DJT from any involvement in any possible Israeli action
Meeting about a strike on Iran? When she had an appointment to get her "streak" freshened? Priorities! 🤡
So why did she get nominated for the position? Why was she appointed? This is not governing. It's careless. Pretty much what I expected from orange julius round 2.
So they know she's a foreign asset, which is fine for them as long as it's only screwing over Ukraine. But when it is about something actually near and dear to them she's out.
Are we sure this isn't a smaer campaign by pro-Turkey/Qatar side? After all even Vance when asked, a week ago, not 3 months away, said he "didn't know if Iran was making a bomb", yet no one mentions him, why? Tulsi pissed a them on AQ Jolani and syria, yet POTUS hugged him
I think what she told him about Iran wasn't what he and his buddy Netanyahu wan't to hear. I'm not a Gabbard fan at all, but I'm more inclined to believe her over Donnieboy and Netanyahu.
You can guess it is imminent from the number of USAF tanker movements over the past few days - 30+ moved from USA to various EU bases and now they are ‘towing’ F15/16/35’s from those bases closer to Israel/Iran. You don’t do that unless you are pretty sure they will be needed.
The correction doesn't say Gabbard wasn't invited to the meeting, or that she didn't take part remotely, or that they didn't meet separately. All of those things could have happened. Not saying your conclusion is wrong, just that you're making a leap that might not be justified.
🤔 Maybe Marco’s doing such a good job as Sec. of State and Nat Sec Advisor that he offered to sub in for the DNI job as well?
Why wouldn’t they trust an Assad apologist and Putin shill who told them that Iran has not had a nuclear weapons program since 2003?
Nowhere there does it say she was "excluded." people make up their own news in their own heads. May she was, maybe she wasn't but all it says is that she did not attend.
If it slinks around like a rat…if it makes rat noises like a rat…chances are you’ve got a rat.🐀🐀🐀
This whole thing is contorted: an unqualified DNI, a president who rejects military & intelligence consult, a president wildly corrupt & susceptible to foreign influence, a denigrated DOD & IC leadership. It’s all toxic & dysfunctional.
in almost every case, trump appointing a woman means he has utter contempt for the either the agency or its mission or both. doj? contempt. dni? contempt. UN? contempt. he hates having a chief-of-staff, so he appointed a woman. literally a tell...
If we attack Iran i wouldn't be surprised if Tulsi resigned in protest. I would be furious right now if I was her after what Trump said to the press. That he doesnt care what she says?
You had to be completely incompetent to not see an attack on Iran unfolding. I knew it was coming and I'm just a nobody digging through lesser talked about news items from around the world. The United States has been shuffling assets all around Iran for months.
Zoom out, Jim. What does that tell us about a president that would put someone like that in such a sensitive position in the first place? It tell us he really doesn’t care about this country or about its citizens.
Fran the cheerleader told Chelsea the newspaper editor that Mary Ellen didn’t go to Bridget’s party. Chelsea wrote about it in the school newspaper’s breaking news. Lisa then posted that Mary Ellen wasn’t there because Bridget didn’t like her. Go back to high school.
Tulsi Gabbard is a russian asset. That fact is pretty obvious. Less clear is why Trump appointed her as Director of National Intelligence, putting a wolf in the hen house.
Image
The Entire Government is being run by incompetent Maga driven Male Egos, Never before has there been a more incompetent administration as Trumps "Decisions are being made about Americans future by billionaires who's only interest is in protecting their own financial investments