Post

Conversation

Oftentimes it’s precisely the people with something concrete on the line — like Rep McBride here — who are most willing to be pragmatic.
Quote
Oriana González
@OrianaBeLike
SCOOP: Sarah McBride and other Dems have discussed how the party must accept Ds with differing stances on trans rights to not alienate people “We have to create more space in our tent,” she told me An inside look at Dems’ reshuffling on trans issues: notus.org/congress/trans
Show more
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

Matt in 1960: “Black people are not popular with most of our voters so Dems should be pragmatic about civil rights.”
These people haven't gone anywhere though
Quote
Tyler Hackner 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇵🇸🇵🇸☮️☮️🟧🟧
@HacknerTyler
Replying to @OrianaBeLike and @lxeagle17
Big tent our way into fascism
It’s just the sports and it’s an OBVIOUS drugs in sports issue. 1, NONE of those in question would be eligible w/o drugs: red flag. 2 & fatal, w NIL, notoriety=big $, +scholarships, 100% people will dial in hormones=women on testosterone masked w epite T for %. Pharmacy games
The basis of calling ignorance of biology and for what sex-based set asides really are… as Trans-rights…. Is the issue. Unfortunately there are plenty of bigots on the right. And they’re balanced out by the idiocy on the left. No different the the DEI discourse. Stupid
Maybe that's true. By the same token you dont have to fight in the wars you cheer, wont lose your job and quality of life to the free trade and open borders policies you shill for - you have nothing on the line, so you refuse to be pragmatic
Meh I would still fight like hell on this being a free expression right come what may. If the government can define gender expression then they can define all sorts of expressions within each gender. Free expression is not just a privilege for politically popular groups.
The way radicals think is that it's their responsibility to be non-pragmatic and unyielding, because the people with something concrete on the line don't have the freedom to do that.
What she's saying is good, but it's not "pragmatic" to stop insisting your group has rights that no one else has or even asks for.
Many of the trans demands of the last decade, beyond non discrimination laws, are untenable. I think they are seeing in real time that their lives are going to be better under a Democratic administration that respects them a Republican administration that demeans them.
Also one of the benefits of diversity is that you have a wider pool of people who can speak with credibility on a wider swath of issues
You mean like Black people in the Civil Rights era? Or even like say 2020, 2024 or now?
Matt really wants the tent to be big enough for fascists and bigots but never socialists for some strange reason!
Your grandchildren will lie to their children when they talk about what you did with your time during this period of history
How come you stuck in the mud types never have to change? Believe it or not, American Whites used to think Black Americans were dangerous and deficient. But better leaders than you, etc provided moral education. Teach people to be better people.
Trans activists need to look at the gay rights movement of the 90s and mirror it. Want gay marriage but understand Civil Unions is a stepping stone to advance. We need to get off of sports and focus the message on personal choice and basic acceptance of medical treatment
Parents do not want a person with a penis in the middle school girls locker room. Many Democrats cannot understand this. 2028 = President Vance.
I will never vote D again after the trans mania. The lengths they would have to go to win back my vote I doubt any would consider.
You are literally a top 15 person responsible for Kamala blowing the election & what trump is doing right now with ur horrific centrist views. You got everything you ever wanted with Biden & Kamala & they lost the goddamn popular vote. If you had any shame u’d walk into the woods
Why would men pretending they’re women be a problem? I think the dems should double down!
This is conflicting pablum by someone who is choosing not to lead on an issue that she should absolutely be leading on.
Image
Image
But according you you, and your liberal friends. No this will never work
Quote
Gunther Eagleman™
@GuntherEagleman
BREAKING: Commerce Secretary Lutnick says they have sold 1,000 Gold Cards this week for $5M each! Thats $5,000,000,000 in just a week! HUGE!
Show more
3:59
Rate proposed Community Notes
What if their differing stances are on women’s rights? What about minority rights? What rights do you believe you can sacrifice of other peoples so that you can have power? Human rights are human rights and here you’ve taken a firm stance against them.