Post

Conversation

A couple of folks have crunched the numbers (Evercore ISI - their chart, below; ) and concluded that the U.S. weighted average tariff, with all Trump's new orders in effect, will be higher than under Smoot-Hawley.
Image
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

Evercore ISI has updated their estimates: 23% average tariff with April 2 announcement, 27% with 232 tariffs.
Image
Agreed. People talked about DeepSeek as a Sputnik moment, but the Smoot-Hawley moment may be more to the point. It took several years for that folly to be recognized.
today's global economy is way more integrated and than the 1930s. question is if they'll actually achieve the intended reshoring of manufacturing or just accelerate the shift to automation and alternative supply chains. consumers will feel it first either way
Greg - You realize the Smoot Hawley tariffs were ad valorem (dollar amounts) that were initially fairly small when our net export channel was 5% of GDP, it was the ‘31 banking crisis and resultant 25-30% CPI/PPI deflation that increased their size in percent terms. Doug Irwin’s
slamming on the brakes on growth. trumpers are degrowthers. and, while at it, let's misallocate capital and create dead weight. forget comparative advantage. every country can each reshore everything. we'll make our own fenders and washers, thank you.
which probably tells you they can’t last long. a 25% bump in iphone prices will probably do the trick
I see a chart that says that number prior to 4/2 was where we should be. Announcement today is intended to created leverage to get there. Also, Trump saying we have been ripped off for decades makes sense with this chart
For perspective, US tariffs ranged from 15% to 50% in the 19th century. The US economy became #1 in 1890. The date range chosen & Smoot-Hawley reference are intended to mislead rather than illuminate. The erroneous point is that 20% tariffs are synonymous with economic depression
Image
think their estimate includes 25% tariffs on Canada + Mexico... if you bring that down to 7.5% and 5% respectively based on the exemptions, effective tariff rate is closer to 20% i believe
I think the problem is that we don’t realize how much everything we use is or in part connected to trade on the things we use. It’s like when there is a power outage we get shocked on how much we can’t do without electricity. Everything is connected.
Tariffs are terrible. They transfer wealth from consumers to producers and hinder growth. Smoot-Hawley was a nightmarish disaster. However, to correctly interpret your chart we must be aware, among other things, the highest income tax rate started the 1920s at 77%. 1/2
I assume it will go down as other countries lower tariffs and we have increased global trade? would that work?
If I were a U.S. trading partner I'd be thinking seriously about making a deal ... not counting on crashing the world economy to get the U.S. to cave.
well, we fairly quickly retreated from the imposition last time...
It dropped to 25% in the mid-1920s, was raised to 63% in 1932, peaked at 94% in 1944, and stayed above 70% for a few decades.
Great Depression 2.0! Thank you president Trump! Because we'll have to climb out of this the same way we climbed out of it last time, unionize the nation! The wealthy lorded over us around 1900. By 1950, 45% of workers were unionized and the middle class was born! #UnionStrong
Not sure where you are going with this. Are you insinuating that there is a great depression around the corner? You might need to brush up on your study of Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz research, which resulted in a Nobel Prize in Economics. Monetary policy matters. POWELL?
When the Smoot-Hawley tariffs were imposed we had a trade surplus. Now we have the biggest trade deficit in the history of the world.
Have to think any right minded CEO is not going to rush out and invest billions on expanded manufacturing operations knowing that these tariffs are likely to be shortlived as in Trump’s term in office