Post

Conversation

This picture accurately summarizes policymakers' error in thinking that has made the coast of California one of the most highly segregated places in the country. The first image is Surfside, Florida, where the avg condo costs $900k. The second is La Jolla, avg home value $2.3m
Quote
J.T. Maximus (He/Him/God)๐Ÿ”Œ+๐Ÿš—+๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ+๐Ÿ =โค
@stuntman760
Replying to @paulkruegersd @MayorToddGloria and @JoeLaCavaD1
Image
125.3K
Views
David Watson ๐Ÿฅ‘
Post your reply

Square profile picture
Sailrock South Caicos Is a Meticulously Planned Low-Density Community of Villas and Suites for Sale in the Turks & Caicos Islands. Nestled Between Two Beaches, Sailrock Is a Sunrise-Sunset Beachfront Haven Offering Unmatched Privacy That Spans for Miles.
That's not "segregation," that's just market pricing. And guess what? All of us San Diegans can go to the beach whenever we want. We don't have to live within 1/4 mile of the water, whatever our race, creed, or skin color.
A crucial difference is the terrain behind the towers. Florida is dead flat. In San Diego, you can see the Ocean from the hill in Kate Sessions Park, a mile and a half from the beach.
I know it's not your original post but La Jolla is super hilly and cliffy and supports about as much density as it possibly can already. Up where things are stable there's a bunch of high density highrises and apartment buildings. Traffic in/out is terrible.
Also Florida has plenty of beach access. in Jacksonville the city runs the facilities including the bridges over the dunes. heck homeless people sleep on the beach at night (and don't bother anyone)
And neither will remain viable as sea levels rise. Put towns further inland and have beach infrastructure limited to what you can afford to lose.
Surfside is more densely populated than La Jolla but La Jolla is about twice as wealthy. Feel like real estate prices in both are reflective of the respective wealth in both areas.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Also, the hills from which you can see the beach are just as expensive (if not more) than the areas immediately on the coast
Public access to that San Diego beach is vastly superior to that in Florida. There is a parking lot right at the beach and the beach is filled with families from all over San Diego County. Actually, San Diegoโ€™s best family beach.
I mean in fairness, you won't be able to finish paying the mortgage on the condos in the top photo before that entire block is torn apart again by a hurricane. Both of these photos are policy failures. Neither are a model for success.
What an idiot; one of those photos has coastal views for a few hundred, one has coastal views for a few thousand. Which is giving โ€œviews for allโ€?
Indeed, the rich pay more for a view if they want, other people walk to the beach, or do things not beach related.
Yes... California's struggles to get the improved zoning it desperately needs is the only reason for the price difference, not that one picture is within easy reach of two major global cities and more convenient access to Asia & Oceania while the other is in fucking Florida.
Georgia: Vice President Harris Predicted to Win Vice President Kamala Harris is likely to secure victory in Georgia, thereby gaining 16 electoral votes. Key Insights from the Forecast: โ€ข It appears that Georgia has not fully learned from the 2020 election experiences, which may
Show more
Image
Lmao and the argument further down the thread from them is "there are parks where you can see the ocean from miles away because the views aren't blocked by condos"
You are comparing one policy failure Florida real estate which is falling apart under rising insurance costs from building in flood zones with another policy failure which is ridiculous housing prices in California due to the absence of dense development. Both of you are idiots.
Also California has a hilly coastline while Florida doesnโ€™t. You cannot get an elevated view of the ocean without building high rises in Florida. You can in California.

Discover more

Sourced from across X
high housing costs have made it impossible to be a slacker in major american cities. this is a national crisis
Maybe blue states should let people build homes.
Quote
Stefan Schubert
@StefanFSchubert
The 2030 reapportionment of congressional seats and EC votes is projected to lead to big changes. States where Trump currently leads could together gain 13 seats, whereas states where Harris leads could together lose 13 seats. (Another forecast puts the number at 14.)
Show more
Image
Lina Khan DO NOT read this. Can we please have a monopoly in TV streaming? Some of us are just trying to watch the game out here, why does my TV have 26 apps