Click to Subscribe to Noahpinion
Post
Conversation
![David Watson 🥑](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="96" height="96"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Post your reply
Quote
Liron Shapira
@liron
The key to nuclear safety is nuclear proliferation.
—@bhorowitz
0:01 / 0:45
And we haven’t yet seen what’s likely to happen next: rapid proliferation. U.S. guarantees are fading and countries like Japan, South Korea, the UAE and Saudi Arabia may decide that going nuclear isn’t reckless anymore.
And yet the United States 
remains the only nation to ever use one against an adversary.
remains the only nation to ever use one against an adversary.
Iran is not a peer adversary and India and Pakistan are only in dust-up mode. I would agree that at this point Ukraine is a peer adversary.
This really challenges the theory nuclear weapons end conventional wars…. Doesn’t it?
Good thing history ended at the fall of the Soviet Union and none of this is canonical
I know this is meant as a fearmonger post, and most people will fall for it, but if in two years, they all reach relatively peaceful conclusions with only minimal conventional warfare employed than it bears out the nuclear weapon thesis
Thank you for your intellectual honesty. My next suggestion would be to research Kashmiri Pandits.
Quote
Shivi
@ShivOperator
Really interesting to see how little Americans care about or understand the escalating conflict between India and Pakistan.
No student protests. No Instagram posts. Nothing.
World Leaders Best Positioned to De-escalate the India-Pakistan Situation barackface.net/2025/05/world-
Remember when everyone wanted to see America diminished and the end of "hegemonic" pax America?
Well they're going to get it, good and hard.
India vs. Pakistan is definitely blasting holes in the idea of mass nuclear armament preventing wars
I thought you were referring to North Korea too since they’re technically involved in the war in Ukraine.
So could be 10?
Nuclear innovation is surging. $NUKZ focuses on companies engaged in cutting-edge nuclear reactor technology, designed to provide investors exposure to the forefront of a cleaner energy landscape. Consider investing in the potential growth of nuclear energy.
And you’d never know it from hanging around here anymore. 
And if we include proxy and hybrid wars and anti terror ops then all 9 nuclear powers are engaged in some type of war right now
That FJ guy is a Pakistani who had been sharing propoganda along with news personal opinions mixed with news so be careful
From India side first post, ani
Are the most objective one and accurate
People need to understand that nuclear warheads are mushroom cloud equivalent of fleet in being. The only thing they do is moderate other nations' behavior around you.
That is until a war of annihilation pops off. Then, the cost of using them is no longer too high.
IMF just sanctioned a 1bn USD loan to Pak. If the global community isn't going to do thr needful we will.
On the other hand you have IMF fuelling the situation with $2.3 billion to keep the pot boiling? Irony right? Do spread the kind humble common sense to those apparent no stake in all this lot, ok?
Only two of these four are nuclear powers engaging each other, first time in history, in large scale direct warfare.
Curioso: tantas potencias nucleares en conflicto, pero la verdadera estabilidad vendría de invertir en infraestructuras energéticas robustas, no en arsenales cada vez más grandes.
I thought that Trumpie was going to be ending the Ukraine Russia war within the first week of his Presidency and end the Israel Gaza war. What happened? The world has never been more dangerous than it is today in a very very long time.
