Post

Conversation

Funny watching these guys act like birthright citizenship was proposed and implemented for the first time today.
Quote
Matt Walsh
@MattWalshBlog
Replying to @MattWalshBlog
I at least got to live for 40 years in a country that looks and functions something like America. The fact that my children are having that opportunity stolen from them fills me with rage so deep I can’t describe it. I truly hate the people who have done this to us.
Readers added context
The Supreme Court’s June 30, 2026 ruling on birthright citizenship reaffirmed the definition of birthright citizenship that has been in place for (at least) 128 years. Nothing changed. At 40 yrs old, Walsh has lived his entire life under this same definition. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_St…
Do you find this helpful?
Rate it
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

Why’d we pass the Jones-Shafroth Act of 1917, the Indian Citizenship act of 1924, Virgin Islands Act of 1932, the Nationality Act of 1940, Organic Act of Guam of 1950, or the Mariani islands bill in the 80s if they were Americans because of the 14th amendment from 1865?
These were meant to expand the scope of the amendment to apply to U.S. territories, Indigenous people, etc. due to them not fully being "subject to the jurisdiction" of the US government. Feel free to look this up and read all about it in just a few short minutes.
I've been off twitter for a while, and it's *wild* how these people have rotted their brains huffing agitprop on here 24/7. Was a total non-issue 3-4 years ago, think-tanks like Heritage and Claremont decided to elevate it, and now they dutifully think it's the fate of the nation
Right? Like this they just reaffirmed the status quo essentially and people are having a melt down as if something changed.
Guy who made a documentary called “Am I Racist?” Continues to make that documentary unnecessary to watch just by tweeting the answer to the question.
The same way they act like, in order to vote, you just have to ask for a ballot and they give you one with no questions asked. Either grossly disingenuous or grossly dumb. Either is plausible
Funny I have yet for a single lib to explain to me how illegal aliens producing American citizens is a good thing
Matt already announced he is in pre-production of his next movie “what is a birth?” where he will go undercover as a zygote.
Decision to cater to stupid, illiterate people was made many decades ago. Let's see how it's going to get into the endgame now.
It’s not quite the same as it’s always been now is it? We got good Mexican families come in, not every third world that hates America
Funny to watch you all obtusely ignore the cumulative impact resulting from decades of people exploiting birthright citizenship. Do you endorse birth tourism? Should people raised in China be eligible to vote and run for president?
Almost as if you're missing something Supreme Court should have simply struck down EO (like Gorsuch) and left it to Congress Instead, majority went out of their way to shut the door on a statutory fix and enshrined birthright citizenship not only for illegals but birth tourists