Post

Conversation

David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

The widely accepted hydrogen ladder is updated every couple of years. Categories A & B are the viable areas. Ground transportation and home heating have been found to be non viable.
Image
I had a small assignment back at college to look into renewable tech and I was able to pretty quickly conclude hydrogen power just had to many issues to see widespread economic adoption.
I mean it's not true tho yet at least battery semis and heavy construction equipment are not really a thing, hell I don't even see any battery replacement on the horizon for my diesel powered F350 in the next few decades or so 1/2
The last three times a friend of a friend has pitched an investment theme to me, it's been hydrogen every time. I've mostly given up trying to dissuade them
Batteries receive massive government subsidies, which massively distort competition. This technology only exists because politicians want it, not because people think it's a good idea.
Hydrogen is, by far, ONE OF THE DUMBEST so-called alternatives. It’s rent-seeking at best, and is promoted/fanboyed by people who weren’t paying attention in high school chemistry class. If someone is droning on about this as a solution? 🚩
I think it's more to do with Hydrogen being a PITA to work with. What we need for aviation is carbon-neutral hydrocarbons. Batteries just don't pencil out for aviation.
Image
Must say I was surprised to see so many alt-fuel vehicles in Paris two weeks ago, including this H2 taxi (a first for me), some biofuel and gas-powered too. No electric buses/taxis, though. Can you say why that might be?
Image
I've always been dubious about hydrogen for personal transport, but it will find niche applications. Hydrogen is already being used in semi-trucks, ferries and heavy construction vehicles. There seem to be applications where the weight and/or size of batteries are going to be an
Not true though, hydrogen heavy duty trucks - except mine trucks - have a significant total cost of ownership per transported ton of goods advantage with hydrogen for a fixed time frame of observation. This is what matters for companies.
Needs at least a doubling of density for that penultimate door to truly be done. It’s not there yet. The one he’s at needs an order of magnitude. Not sure that’s even possible.
Esta me hace gracia. Realmente, hasta que el Guapo no aprobó el corredor del hidrógeno nadie nos contactaba para hidrolizadoras. Y ahora que tenemos tubo a la vista, pues hay que llenarlo! . Soy bastante escéptico.
No. Big planes or ships for long distances can‘t work with 🔋. Physics. Ships could use nuclear power or efuels/egas.
Hydrogen semi trucks are not dead unfortunately. Hydrogen combustion engine hype is also on the rise.
well you forget that batteries have to replace fossil fuels and those are not only used as energy but as a commodity/currency as well. Hydrogen has a future because nations and corporations will want something tangible and transportable for international trade(inc. energy).
Yet we seem to be turning off windmills all the time because they produce more electricity than we need and/or can store? So why not produce hydrogen with that power?
The funny thing is that some deluded people think the first door hasn't even been visited yet.
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content

Discover more

Sourced from across X
Sweden is a global heat pump leader. How have they managed to phase out fossil heating oil and deploy millions of heat pumps over a period of 20 years despite having one of the coldest climates in Europe? I will speak about this when I open this event in London in two
Show more
Image