Post

Conversation

Read ⁦⁩ on the mysterious power of the groups. What I was told about this by members who back the bill is that EJ groups with no concrete leverage were just very effective at persuading non-specialist staffers — more a question of epistemics than power.
Image
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

A common sense comeback is going to require more investment in institutions that can do policy development and provide legislative subsidy. We have Niskanen but we need more.
The leverage is that if you make enemies, you won't get your next job. That's a real consideration, MattY -- not everybody got mildly famous getting in at the ground floor of Iraq War era blogging. Some people have to earn salaries where they're replaceable.
The staffers generally know, it’s just that certain members refuse to threaten their 100% League of Conservation Voters record, no matter how nonsensical it is. Can’t tell you how many times members have said “That makes sense” & then backed off under threat from LCV.
Perhaps the thinking was "we should give power to these groups because their ideas are important," rather than "we must give power to these groups because they represent vast constituencies of power." Perhaps a case where morality and politics did not align.
I mean isn't it basically because Democrats, as a whole, but especially at the younger staff level, are just very bad at having any rebuttal to "this will hurt Y group disproportionately"
Part of this comes back to how understaffed and underpaid congressional offices are! They don't have the ability to make their own policy choices, it is all outsourced!
It ignores that the Groups’ leverage is jobs, friendships, and dates for those staffers. These people are all an incestuous pool who hang out, fuck, and get each other work.
Sounds like the member is trying to pass the buck to his staffer. Are you sure those members aren't lying to you?
The average staffer just has no idea that these are essentially astroturf groups with no real membership. The staffer just assumes they are not just powerful, but that they have some moral authority that makes them right in these discussions. They are external validators.
They’re scared these tiny groups will go on social media and try to cancel them. GOP Congressional members are boxed in by fear of Trump publicly lashing out & then getting primaried. Dems are scared of powerful groups who are often far to the left of their base.
They have some power. The power to make a scene. Because people think that a scene is evidence that your house is not in order and if you can’t have your house in order you are incompetent. Q is how much to give away to have your house in order, and if you will actually get it.
There are lots of issues where the general public doesn't have a solid opinion and where it's fine just to go ahead and back a good idea. And then sometimes you discover that you are wrong in that assessment. That's life. Otherwise you are paralyzed.
📈 Crypto peeps, did you know that the data industry is worth a whopping $166 billion? 🤯 That's a lot of zeros! And guess what? Our Human Data Income platform brings the power back to the people. 🫡🐸
How much of this dynamic is from the staffers and group leadership having gone to the same schools and probably being friends. "I believe this and all my friends in the non-profit world believe this, it must be super important and popular".
This is what happened during the negotiations over the Puerto Rico Status Act in 2021 and 2022 … over a year was spent trying to get diaspora activist groups to approve the legislation language
Image
Image
Stuff and nonsense. Haven't you been telling us government agencies are entirely staffed with caring experts, which is why clueless outsiders like Gaetz and RFK are unfit to run them?
Square profile picture
We’re thrilled that has selected to bring the Bitcoin Lightning Network and Universal Money Addresses via the to its platform and 100 million customers. We’re working with the Nu team on the technical integration and will have more to share in the
Show more
Image
This often turns out to be strategic. Staffers who want to push a particular unpopular policy find outside pressure groups lobbying for their preferred position. Way too often, screechy outside agitators reflect policy conflicts inside the agency, rather than the other way.
there is no mystery here. the leverage is that they say you are transphobe or something and you are basically unpersoned in your entire social circle
Well, yeah, it's not hard to convince an idealistic 24yo of stuff. They mostly probably have lived quite insulated lives, have a short resume, and no hard real world responsibilities (kids, mortgage, employees on payroll, etc.)
So, the person Klein is talking to is lying to him. And Klein is too stupid to see that, or so eager to punch left that her doesn’t care.
It was a perception that each of these groups had their own distinct passionate supporters. However, they actually just shared a revolving group of letter, writers and supporters who were passionate about everything.
They are afraid to have anything they do labeled “opposed by ______” and they get called anti-environment or any other way of calling them “not part of our team”.
Ezra Klein is a joke and Ds should be listening to someone new. He helped lead Ds down the open border fiasco. Move on Ds.
A democratic party where environmental groups exert unilateral behind the scenes control over electeds does not create a Biden presidency. I’m sorry, this seems like a flimsy narrative a conservative democrat may deeply want to be true post 2024 election.
It’s that liberals and democrats broadly put people into Good and Bad camps based on other topics/cultural signifiers then group other opinions there
Can't you just say "Go the fuck away, you idiots!" to these people? Why are you all such cowards? You're scared of your own fucking kids, it's really pathetic.
This Post was deleted by the Post author. Learn more
🗞️🚀Energy efficiency relates to the level of energy consumed for a given output. On a macro-economic level, energy intensity is used as a proxy for energy efficiency, which is related to the overall economic output, such as the GDP. Since the adoption of the Paris Agreement,
Show more
Image
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content