Post

Conversation

Devastating evidence against pure signaling explanations of higher education. Apparently people learn things in College which improves labor market success.
Quote
Florian Ederer
@florianederer
App usage is - contagious (sd increase of roommatesโ€™ in-college app usage raises own by 4.4%) - detrimental to academic performance and labor market outcomes (sd increase reduces GPAs by 36% and wages by 2.3%) App restriction policy would boost wages! nber.org/papers/w33054
Show more
Image
David Watson ๐Ÿฅ‘
Post your reply

Implied elasticity is something like 1 SD in within-cohort major GPA -> 6.4% change in wages (if you think all the wage impacts come through GPA)? Pretty large!
Of course, you might think the signaling happens via your school rank rather than just the pure sheepskin effect or getting in, but now we are getting very colinear with human capital itself
What if susceptibility to app contagion/addiction just correlates strongly with susceptibility to being a crap worker? Are there controls (haven't read the paper)?
Agree, we canโ€™t just assume results from the niche market of the US extrapolate to the much larger and more important context of China
Quote
Arpit Gupta
@arpitrage
Replying to @arpitrage
Implied elasticity is something like 1 SD in within-cohort major GPA -> 6.4% change in wages (if you think all the wage impacts come through GPA)? Pretty large!
fact that they reduce GPAs massively but wages only a tiny bit suggests signalling is still very big portion of it
Square profile picture
Around 500 chronically low-performing schools have experienced substantial enrollment declines since the pandemic. Could they be strong candidates for closure? Learn more (including which schools made the list) in Fordhamโ€™s new report by : fordhaminstitute.org/national/resea
The paper examines the effects of mobile app usage, especially gaming apps, on college students' academic performance and labor market outcomes. It also investigates the impact of peer influence on app usage. 1. Mobile app usage is contagious - a one standard deviation (s.d.)
Show more
Image
Or what if the app addiction makes them worse workers and itโ€™s not related to learning - on the phone at work. Not devastating evidence at al, at best a slight update away from signaling but one paper shouldnโ€™t move the needle much, especially not this one.
No -- it's not "devastating evidence". The paper has a N of 20, with completely ridiculous variance estimates. Utter garbage piece of study. I would suggest that it's good practice for any serious academic to actually read the paper before propagandizing it on social media.
Sounds like college does offer real value after all, not just a fancy signal for employers
If susceptibility to digital distraction or even just other unobservables influencing susceptibility to peer influence are heterogenous and important for workplace productivity, couldn't GPA here just signal that? Although maybe the effect size wouldn't work out?
Am I trippin or does a 36% drop in GPA leading to 2% lower wages seem like learnings and grades donโ€™t matter that much?
Isn't app usage just a proxy for less conscientious? Wouldn't these ppl have always found some distraction? Isn't it striking the impact on GPA is so much higher than on wages? Wouldn't that suggest learning stuff is important to get a grade but not hugely for wages?
There is no one advocating for a pure signaling explanation anyway. Bryan Caplan has it as 80% signaling and 20% other stuff. Also, if your hypothesis is true, what are the things people learn, and why must one attend college to learn them?
Findings from the Chinese labor market don't imply that signalling theories of higher ed don't apply in the US
Still need to read the paper but how does it differentiate between private returns from signaling and human capital?
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content