Post

Conversation

David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

"Because most of the towers targeted by the ordinance are historic, it’s likely that the sprinkler installation process will involve removing lead paint and asbestos." I imagine this is where the huge costs are coming from
It turns out SF has a structure fire rate almost 40% lower than the national average.
Quote
Jason,
@jasonc_nc
Replying to @hardiksd
The math just doesn’t show up that way, I’m sorry. -1.3% of FD calls overall are structure fires. And that can include “put out a stove fire with an extinguisher.” San Francisco is even lower - 0.8%. 78% of SFFD calls are medical & auto accidents. The reality is firefighters x.com/jasonc_nc/stat…
Show more
They tried this in one of the towns where I worked and rental properties were getting quoted $100k for houses that would sell for 350k
Nothing wrong with improving safety, but the cost is high. Most plumbing is hidden which makes it hard to install and more expensive. Sprinklers are exposed plumbing, should be a lot easier to install and cheaper. $300k seems like a lot. How many rooms? 4? $75k/room? Yikes!
can't read due to firewall, but 1) why is this stunning? it's compliance w/ a law passed in 1993 and continuously postponed. 2) isn't this necessary to prevent deaths from fires?
This is a little high, but honestly huge surprise assessments are kind of a thing in older high rise condo buildings. It turns out the condo association always defers maintenance and upgrades until they're crazy expensive and cannot be avoided. $50k is totally normal.
Walked through the Franklin Towers in LA right after they had to refit all their sprinklers. Can't remember the exact number, but it was an outrageous number to want to buy a 440 sq ft studio. Oh, and they had another $20M in earthquake retrofit to go. Thanks, no high rises.
Over 20 years ago SF imposed building wide, unit by unit sprinkler requirements on SRO owners. It's been a huge success. Sprinklers are a vital safety measure in tall buildings.
Hopefully they've also done their deck inspections... Just tear it down and start over I guess. That'll only take a decade of permitting.
If the government can’t complete a project (e.g. high speed rail) because of over regulation, isn’t it a sign we need to start unwinding mandates?
Isn’t there also a ridiculous mandate to increase the sound of fire alarms in each unit? I believe the wiring in order buildings cannot be retrofitted and require all new equipment while the alarms are already loud enough to wake up any even sleeping with earplugs. It is all a
The math there is tilted toward having a total loss from fire and just building a new tower from the ground up
Sprinkler system costs go up because the mandates surge demand for contractors, permitting in SF. Companies can overcharge even more, as the overly tight deadlines approach. Thank the SFBoS for the "safety" measure that threatens housing. Nothing corrupt about this🤷‍♂️💵