Post

Conversation

David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

Amazing take
Quote
Wally Nowinski
@Nowooski
Replying to @AlecStapp
Calling it “firefighter” is how we get men to sign up for care work.
Since smoking has dropped, so have house fires. But you still need firefighters, so they try to make themselves useful elsewhere, partly to stave off budget cuts I suspect.
But if there’s a very big fire / disaster, you’d probably want your dept to be able to handle it, which means you’ll have excess manpower during the 99.9% of the time you’re not dealing with a disaster.
Having trained as an EMT in a class of mostly young men, I think merging fire & EMS was a mistake. Most of those guys want to be firefighters -- not medics -- & many are not temperamentally suited to the latter.
Fire department out in my neighborhood yesterday and one of the firefighters said it was 80% medical call outs. When I asked why, he said because they have a much better response time than most ambulances.
Image
This is why I believe in volunteer fire fighters ran by a few professionals. We also need to change the laws so that mobile medical care can do care on the street without taking every person to the hospital.
Firefighter here. This graph doesn't acknowledge the regionality involved in this line of work. Here in the northeast, we still burn frequently, especially in lower income areas. Start taking numbers on a national scale involving rural communities, and of course your graph looks
Show more
Image
Is responding to car accidents bundled under medical calls? It’s really the only time I ever see a fire truck anymore
is that necessarily to the bad - calling it fire fighters emphasizes you MAY have to do the hardest part of the job at some sharp-point but then luckily now less often than before - less fires means we're getting smarter about it - if firefighters do the medical things then
Show more
because hospitals and insurance won't pay enough to have adequate ambulance coverage They are essentially benefiting from this tax payer funded service rather than having it be a fee for service that runs through insurance
most US fire departments are volunteer, aka run by a couple families who have been doing it for generations ambulance is main source of revenue to keep it going municipalities don't want to raise property taxes bonds can only be spent on buildings operating costs go up
Been true for many years. Most fire engines have 4 firefighters which is one or two more than most need for the majority of calls.
Appalling. When are our politicians gonna stand up to the Big Fire Extinguisher Lobby ?! We demand more fires now !
Yes, firefighters are actually first responders and are second on scene, after police, for a medical call, followed by 3rd party paramedics in many cases. Generally, injury or elderly. In an age of abundance, each residence might have an emergency room with tele-responder,
Show more
How about you plot spending in the firefighting industry. We used to have volunteer firefighters in every city. Hell, I was one myself. What happened?
Firefighters in Illinois are called so much to lift old people at assisted living that they are going to start charging “lift fees”. Retirement homes are fine with it, they will charge the residents and employees no longer have to lift (save on workers comp accidents).
They respond quickest to medical related calls. They're strategically placed in cities so that they can arrive on scene quickly. Paramedics is a toss up a lot of the time. Plus your local fire department wont bill you like paramedics/ambulance.
Look at people that have “affordable” medical insurance coverage, those that seek preventive medicine, and those that use ERs as their doctor during that time period. We pay the most for our care and the results don’t even deliver better quality of life.
So one reason firefighters are so much faster responding to medical calls in rural areas is that the few ambulances have to drive a great distance to the hospital. Firefighters are always nearby. Getting ambulances to cover rural areas is tough. The economics aren’t great.
they should train all nurses as firefighters, or all firefighters are nurses. perhaps also train them as police officers also. that way they can take care of all emergencies.
I know in a lot of areas - including most of the areas I've lived in - the only ambulances/ EMTs all seem to be integrated with the fire departments? So if someone calls 911 for an ambulance, more often it is the fire dept that rolls out?
This is a problem. As volunteer firefighter, one of the reasons I left was due to all the medical calls. People eat carbs for a few decades then die in a mess of obese diabetes. We go on a call which frequently included a dead body and huge pile of meds do be documented.
I was landscaping for this really rich dude once. The local fire dept brought a truck and crew to his house and used their truck/ladder to shine the brass ball at the top of his flag pole. I shit you not.
Yes. Meanwhile the building and housing fire regulation codes keep getting stricter and stricter, forcing up costs well beyond any sensible cost benefit analysis.
Firefighters want to give you a 5-minute ride to the hospital for $1500. They figured out that's pretty lucrative.
it seems sensible to me if you are going to staff a firehouse to give them things to do when there aren't fires. it also provides continuous training on getting out the door quickly, exercising the vehicles and so on
This is why SF is constant sirens. They are an absolute menace. Gotta BLAST those air horns to get ladders and hoses to the overdoses.
Who cares they still fight the fires and they also do the work no one else is and manage not to randomly shoot innocent people like the cops do
Yet they haul around the biggest fire trucks/engines in the world, with all the fire fighting requipment and water reserves to respond to a medical call.
You would think that is because there are less fires, which means weird is good?
I’ve been saying fire departments are a boondoggle for years. When they aren’t washing their trucks or playing ping pong at the firehouse they unnecessarily send 2 trucks out to every fender bender where they stand around pointlessly all to justify their extravagant expense! Some
☝️I don’t know it makes sense that the needle hasn’t moved aggressively in 40 years. And if anything this is a good sign. Less actual fires. Maybe we’re much safer than back then. Medical calls have always been at the top of the chart. We did add 118,000,000 people to this
Show more
It's really not that weird Count on your hands how many fires you've seen Count on your hands how many car accidents/medical emergencies you've seen The overlap of EMT/Firefighter in the industry is insanely high
They’re simply responding to calls they wouldn’t have gone on 40 years ago. Good use of guys who would otherwise be getting paid to sit around the firehouse.
It’s mostly responding to old people and fat people who have fallen and can’t get up. The prior is inevitable and a worth-while service. The latter is completely preventable and a drag on taxpayers.
We should stop teaching people how to put out fires. Too much stuff is also flame retardant. Make Firefighting Great Again.
It’s maddening that in LA, fire trucks escort every ambulance to medical calls. And on top of it, LAFD paramedics often handoff the patient to a private contractor for hospital transport! Why not just dispatch a paramedic that does it all and be done with it?
Most fire departments are also EMS, but your towns ISO fire rating for insurance is determined by coverage, so if your fire crews are out on medical calls all day and can’t cover fires it messes with towns ratings and insurance.
Average squad run: Please respond to 420 shithole avenue for a 63 year old female complaining of stomachache pain. On scene: you want to go to the hospital? Patient: no Ok, sign here…. Show us in service. Returning on a refusal.