CA's prohousing caucus has thrown down gauntlet: No more CEQA, period, for any housing project on an infill site (up to 20 acres!) that complies with applicable general plan & zoning standards.
A decisive break w/ "everything bagel" tradition!
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavC
1/3
Conversation
When the freakout begins, remember:
- that Washington State passed similar bill with only 3 lawmakers dissenting
- that CA's Little Hoover Commission urged precisely this reform
- that CEQA will still apply to general plan & zoning changes
2/3
And there will be freakout. Just was there was when governor proposed a piddlywinks CEQA package just two years ago (that got watered down to near nothingness).
Will "abundance" vibes carry the new bill through? We shall see!
x.com/CSElmendorf/st
3/3
Without clicking in to read the bill…
Will projects with small amounts of mixed-use retail also be exempt? Or does it have to be 100% residential?
If the latter, new walkable mixed-use projects may not happen for a long time.
Wow! The Ark Roofing & Restoration team in The Woodlands, TX just took this roof to a whole new level with help from SRS Distribution in Cypress, TX. They're transforming #Texas homes & making strides toward a #cleaner & #greener future, one roof at a time!
#ShoutoutSaturday
Newly requiring a Phase I ESA as part of the Planning process is odd?
This should be dealt with the building application and not as an entitlement matter.
Gauntlet indeed. This report was written by my good friend, neighbor and Paul Hastings Environmental Lawyer Chris Carr.
pacificresearch.org/wp-content/upl
Why can't we just have a Prop 13 (citizen referenda) for pro housing policies or is the issue is such a ballot proposition could end up losing not to mention enforcement concerns (resistance by local government)?
This is incredible news…and should be applied to transit and clean energy too. We have to be the state of builders again.
Haven't read bill, but suspect this is a big overreach, at least for infill. Will be a lot of pushback. Will be ct challenges, maybe in leg too. Why eg is infill separate category & exempt? And due process etc. Cities will find workarounds eg "nuisance" suits, increase setbacks.
California has the nation’s highest housing costs. Some blame a housing shortage; others, government policies. We sit down with experts to explore what’s driving costs and discuss the state-mandated Housing Development initiative and why some cities push back.
1:31
Why Housing Costs Are Still Through the Roof in California
Sigh. California really is rejecting environmental principles in favor of early 20th century growth ambitions. Good thing I’m at the end of my career. It was a good one.
You have to wonder if this recent mini-flurry of regulating is a response to harsh criticism of Newsom's regime- such as this absolutely scathing piece in CalMatters (people should read the whole thing).
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Discover more
Sourced from across X
I would very much like people to explain to me why blocking construction (whether from private or public agencies) is a good and hard-fought progressive or conservative win.
What is the argument for keeping the massive regulatory apparatus strangling any progress?
This was barely a decade ago.
2 competent, fully coherent, men in their 50s/60s disagreeing at the margins about ways to make our society a little more productive. Nothing but respect for one another.
We’ve completely spiraled out of control politically since then.
This person was a legal immigrant on a student visa and was detained by ICE for the crime of *checks notes* authoring an op-ed asking her university to divest and put out a statement.
Quote
Tori Bedford
@Tori_Bedford
Tufts student Rumeysa Ozturk was detained by ICE.
A video shared with GBH News shows a man in a hoodie approach her, then grab her wrists. Ozturk screams, then asks “Can I call the police?” before being told “We’re the police.”
wgbh.org/news/local/202
@sweetadelinevt @GBHNews
Show more