Post

Conversation

China is now threatening to take unprovoked "direct military action" against Japan without Security Council approval. Two weeks straight of progressively crazier unhinged threats and we're supposed to believe that Japan is the aggressive actor.
Image
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

I suggest we all start telling the various Chinese government officials and agencies here on X that they are annoying and not welcome on our platform, post the following reply to everything they post. It’s time to call them out for their hypocrisy
Image
China hasn’t won a war in a very long time. The only reason they won against the nationalists was because they sat out WW2 and let then nationalists fight. After the nationalists freed China, and were worn out they attacked and won, but that it. Against a skilled enemy they lose
Article 53 and Article 107 of the United Nations Charter (hereinafter collectively referred to as the enemy state clauses) are regarded today, as provisions that have become invalid. Japan and Germany jointly submitted a resolution to the United Nations General Assembly in 1995,
This feels more like a diplomatic play, meant to get people thinking a certain way, rather than an actual call for direct confrontation. No one wants an open conflict in the region right now; it's all about posturing and pushing the narrative.
They really should attack. The result would be the ruin of the CCP. New government formed with Taiwan as the victor.
This outward aggression is primarily motivated by internal loyalty tests to the regime. Very similar to the way some Chinese diplomats acted during the Cultural Revolution.
I think China probably just wanted an opportunity to take action to attack the Takaichi administration. There's no other way to explain it.
"Two weeks straight of progressively crazier unhinged threats and we're supposed to believe that Japan is the aggressive actor" You skipped the part where the japs threthened China with military action on domestic China issue, Taiwan..
It’s surprising to see the Chinese Embassy citing the enemy state clauses as if they were current, active policy tools. For accuracy: ◉ The “enemy state clauses” in Articles 53 and 107 of the UN Charter are considered obsolete after WWII ◉ The UN General Assembly has
Image
To the leaders of other countries who made statements that they did not like, The Consul General's statement suggesting the killing is abnormal. Affirm it and take more aggressive actions The state is a barbaric country that denies the rule of law and justice.
It seems International Rules and Laws are NOTHING for CCP as proofed with their Actions in Spratly Islands Region. Continuous Support to Japan in SNS Space must be helpful for the Peace and Freedom for Indo-Pacific Region.
Nonono the 5000 year cummie shitory Cummieland is always the victim and would triumph over foreign powers who are always trying to prevent their rise!
China's argument is completely absurd. Japan is obligated to maintain an exclusively defensive posture and has contributed to world peace for the past 80 years. China is trying to justify its military actions by spreading the delusion that Japan will invade Taiwan.
China’s economy is in the toilet and there is not much else their government can do other than point fingers at other countries.
It's frustrating to see China's position being misunderstood. For decades, China held back on this specific UN rule till recently. The repeated concerning statements from Japan feel like they're testing that old agreement; it's like they're forgetting the very reasons that the
Translated from Japanese
I'm going along with shadowboxing. By the way, what about the apology for the abusive remarks against our Prime Minister Takaiichi?