The new NAEP isn’t all bad news. The kids who weren’t in school when we shut it down for 1-2 years are rolling through the system and starting to out-perform the ones who were in elementary school when schools were closed.
Boys & low-income kids saw the biggest upswing.
Conversation
Isn't that the logical conclusion? Why would kids unaffected by the shut downs perform *worse* than those that were? The real good news would be them performing better than all prior cohorts.
Discover more
Sourced from across X
We’ve never seen drops in achievement like this before. It’s basically a loss of a year and a half of knowledge per child and a reversal of three and a half decades of steady progress.
The system isn’t designed to fix the scale of the problem. And the problem isn’t being fixed.
Knowledge-rich education doesn't merely challenge educational progressivism. It collides with some of the deepest commitments of American life:
Individualism.
Local control.
Personalization.
Choice.
Distrust of authority.
That's why it remains more admired than adopted.
My favorite genre of Atlantic articles is the one where they present something as nuanced that has been obvious to conservatives all along
Decline in religion made politics more vitriolic
Family structure matters
Now this:
Declining K-12 enrollment is a worldwide phenomenon. What does this mean for the thousands of neighborhood schools that are now too empty to justify their own existence?