1/8
Good FT piece on the increasing difficulty economists have in understanding, correlating and reconciling Chinese economic statistics. This leads to concerns among many analysts that GDP may be overstated, and fairly substantially.
Conversation
![David Watson 🥑](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="96" height="96"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Post your reply
2/8
For the FT (and for many others), the biggest puzzle is over how GDP growth can stay constant at 5% even as investment (which plays a bigger role in driving Chinese GDP growth than in any other country in history) is reportedly declining.
4/8
Part of the answer may be that GDP growth has in fact declined, and rapidly, over 2025, albeit from extremely high levels. Another part of the answer may be the surging trade surplus, which is extraordinarily high for such a large economy, and clearly not sustainable.
5/8
For all the promises by Beijing to rebalance the economy, rising consumption growth is not the answer because Beijing still hasn't figured out how to get consumption growth to accelerate.
GDP growth, of course, is the sum of the growth in consumption, investment, and net
6/8
I'd add that I think one of the biggest problems with the reported GDP data, which isn't really discussed in the article, may be the lack of any mechanism that forces recognition of bad investment, so that investment losses at the SOE and local-government level are...
7/8
often capitalized (i.e. recorded on the balance sheet as assets) rather than expensed (recorded as a reduction in profits). This is turn allows officials to post higher GDP growth rates than they otherwise would by overstating investment, income, and value-added production.
8/8
If this weren't happening (i.e. if the investment were productive), it would be very difficult to explain why – in an economy in which almost all recorded debt goes to fund investment – debt has been rising so much faster than GDP for nearly two decades.
“Concerns that it may be overstated” is a really, really diplomatic way of putting it, Michael. I would have gone with “everyone knows the stats are bureaucratically inflated, but no one has a reliable alternative.”
1). St. Louis Federal Reserve: All told, assessing the accuracy of China's GDP growth remains a challenge and no statistical model can provide a definitive alternative measure. But our analysis suggests that official figures have not recently been overstating GDP growth for three
I know I've got zero evidence for this. But my gut feeling is that China GDP is underreported. Their production numbers measured in tons, units, kWh etc is so enormous that compared with everyone else. 30+ million cars, 55% of world steel, 2x US electricity demand and so on.
There seems to be no endgame for Xi—just kicking the can down the road. Trump actually offers him an escape route via a trade deal. China could rebalance by gradually reducing and eventually ending subsidies, financial repression, and currency controls. Many Chinese companies
They're mixing real numbers with financial reshuffling. Like recently where banks were offering loans with interest subsidies just so money keeps recyling adding to the irrgularities.
So ofcourse GDP numbers don't make sense if you look at them without context
This is new news? I thought it was widely known that china’s been cooking the books for years.
Way too many (including Beijing) put way too much stock in growth numbers. China probably hasn't actually grown since the property bubble collapsed.
Transparency in stats is crucial for trust, especially among BRICS partners. Data credibility strengthens global cooperation and fair trade.
This has been going on for the years; the CEI GDP data at the provincial level never tallied with what was reported at the national level
So......government numbers are wrong? How could that be? Econometrics fail?
Maybe factor in a correction for the completely fake population figure.
Lmao. Could it be that traditional western economic dogma might not explain everything? No it must be an entire fucking country that's wrong.
You have failed to understand China for decades. 
China' gDP is underestimated, not over estimated, because china artificially maintains low FX rate.
Translated from Chinese
Bro, after more than a decade, you're still so stupid. The ideology in your brain makes you a fucking idiot. The majority of economists worldwide are fucking idiots because the humanities are dead. You all just yap all day in university without any real practice. Pathetic.