"It's fundamentally unfair to collect tax revenues from everyone for rail operation, but then prohibit people from living close enough to benefit from these investments. SB 79 would bring that practice to an end" - on our new bill w/
Post
Conversation
![David Watson 🥑](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="96" height="96"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Post your reply
Homes near transit currently are illegal? Or did Scott just need another bill?
You cheap fucks also want us to pay for your cheap government housing near these stations right?
Pretty sweet deal.
I will have all my friends oppose this.
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Discover more
Sourced from across X
it’s amazing to see some of congestion pricing’s strongest opponents change their minds once they see how effective it is
This Post is from an account you blocked.
Almost feel bad for this young woman who is out of her depth and getting her ass handed to her.
OTOH she works for DOGE and is being listened to by ppl w power who know even less than she does about government contracts and payments.
Quote
DataRepublican (small r)
@DataRepublican
Replying to @JuddLegum and @Oilfield_Rando
Hello Mr. Legum,
I did read your blog and examined the historical data. As a standard practice, contractors utilize their full spending authority.
In analyzing hundreds of thousands of completed records, I identified only two instances where the awarded amount fell short of
Show more