Post

Conversation

If no classified material was sent, then publishing the material in full would cause no damage to national security, and (barring some other exemption) it could be FOIAed and published by anyone.

Quote

Karoline Leavitt

@PressSec

Mar 25

Jeffrey Goldberg is well-known for his sensationalist spin. Here are the facts about his latest story: 1. No “war plans” were discussed. 2. No classified material was sent to the thread. 3. The White House Counsel’s Office has provided guidance on a number of different

Rate proposed Community Notes

The simplest way for Leavitt to demonstrate that Goldberg is wrong and Hegseth et al. are right would be to publish (or invite The Atlantic to publish) the unredacted Signal transcripts.

Here is the (almost) unredacted transcript. Hegseth shares the exact timing and nature of impending strikes against Houthis. Waltz mentions that a target is "their top missile guy" and says he was identified "walking into his girlfriend's building."

Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisers Shared on Signal

Some of the sensitivities are obvious. But look at the details. The US had eyes on the building entrance. Now the Houthis know to round up and interrogate anyone who was there when the target went in. If the intel source was human, he better be on a dhow to safety by now.

7:23 AM · Mar 26, 2025

23.1K

Views

Post your reply

Graeme Wood

@gcaw

10h

The Houthis also know that confirmation didn't come from inside the building. So they can make certain inferences about the ability of the US to track this particular target (and others like it) with confidence inside buildings. Every little clue can help.

These details aren't nuclear codes, but with just a little imagination you can see why in normal circumstances it would be a career-ending act of negligence to send them to some random person who was not supposed to have them.

Graeme Wood

@gcaw

This tweet amounts to saying "what about all the classified information I DIDN'T send to Goldberg?"

Quote

Pete Hegseth

@PeteHegseth

So, let’s me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so-called “war plans” and those “plans” include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information. Those are some really shitty war plans. This only proves

Rate proposed Community Notes

13K

Graeme Wood

@gcaw

Another fun example of damage from a passing comment on Signal. Waltz said the target was the Houthis' "top missile guy." Now the Houthis know who we thought their top missile guy was. If he wasn't the top guy, they now know that the actual top guy is safe.

1.5K

David Reaboi, Late Republic Nonsense

@davereaboi

10h

Almost certainly this was Intel gathered by drone.

I'll take your word for it!

564

UNIFYD

@UNIFYDTV

Amjad Fseisi was a CIA officer when he decided to go on a blind date to meet the undercover “swiper.” The swiper used a hidden mic and camera to capture her conversations with her blind date, to see what kind of intel he may or may not confess.

0:44

Watch American Swiper Now on UNIFYD TV

Had to look up “dhow” — one of the reason I follow you.

To view keyboard shortcuts, press question markView keyboard shortcuts

Post

Conversation

To view keyboard shortcuts, press question mark
View keyboard shortcuts