Post

Conversation

David French
@DavidAFrench
This is utterly absurd, embarrassing spin. "There were no threats to our servicemembers or our  national security" because Jeffrey Goldberg was more careful with our national secrets than the SECDEF. Good lord.
Quote
Jennifer Griffin
@JenGriffinFNC
NSC statement:  "At this time, the message thread that was reported appears to be authentic, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain. The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing x.com/jengriffinfnc/…
Show more
155.5K
Views
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

Tony Tancredi
@ByterBoy
The level of general incompetence in the last 20 years of government, at all levels, is unbelievable. But, we keep voting the dummies into office.
1.3K
Henry Charles
@truewordaddict
They ‘accidentally’ let the opposition in and as the NSC points out, the texts show a thoughtful conversation. Perhaps that is what they wanted. Their base is against another war. The Atlantic dude offered a ‘behinds the scenes peak’ showing that they will make The EU pay.
471
Stan Brown
@Stanonstuff
David, what have you written about the danger from Biden admin allowing thousands of terrorists into America where they still pose a threat to my family? If you think the text is a danger, the deliberate importation of terrorists must by a million times more dangerous. Right?
589
Rebecca
@Rebecca93857396
Every lawyer knows what you’re supposed to do when you receive an inadvertent message, so I’m not sure why you’d call what Goldberg did “responsible.” It was not. He continued eavesdropping on NatSec comms that he knew very well he had no business seeing. Should’ve called Waltz
275
Waterman 🚰 🤷‍♂️ 🌽
@WmTWaterman
What jumps out are the words "group chat." Senior officials were discussing an operation in a group chat?!
470
Andres
@Daedalus6
“The survival of Mike Vronsky in the Deer Hunter proves that Russian Roulette is perfectly safe”
Image
62
Monk
@VangoJenkins
Even in the reporting, Goldberg does an incredibly careful job of only showing past events, expressly stating he is not reporting on those facts that could harm troops.
171
xavi
@xzapata99
Yeah, because Goldberg didn't want to wait 2 years to publish this, like the "blockbuster" cemetery piece, either. So careful not to miss an opportunity. Your own spin here is also noteworthy.
323
Travis Stanford
@travishb
(Raises hand) How can they be sure? I know nothing but I do know everyone in that group is a target of a foreign intelligence service. All of them, including Goldberg. How do they know nobody else was reading the texts? I believe the US could get them. Why not others?
129
Failure to Elude
@SmotWicket
It defies common sense to think leaking this to Jeffrey Goldberg was not a threat to opsec. If they had leaked to Khameni maybe there's an argument to be had.
64
Don 'T-reply 💙💛
@bx28645
and no one was harmed by ANY of HRC's emails yet they wanted her prosecuted (and probably if they could executed) for use of a private email server.
97
Will White
@WillWhi86
Someone’s gotta resign over this. Sending details of imminent military action over an app? Unbelievable the incompetence in this administration.
12
Wretched Ink
@WretchedInk
I think Goldberg should have alerted secdef immediately that he had been included in the chat and reported on that after the strikes. Waiting left the door open for other nefarious actors. But yes, he was more careful with natsec than the trove of idiots on the chat. Top. Men.
303
bobbyjoedestin
@bobbyjoedestin
Anyone who believes this wasn’t a set up is naive It was planned and we have a problem inside that is now fully exposed and it will be dealt with It’s just too damn tidy
14
MoeS
@MoeS16273899
If The NY Times got intel, released it and got servicemen killed you’d be defending them so I might get off your soap box
10
mr.rolwes
@MrRolwes
“Forget the myths the media has created about the White House. The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.”
72
KL🦩
@K1mibear
"Deep and thoughtful policy coordination!?" Yea, the American flag and bomb emojies were super thoughtful. 🙄 These ppl are a joke and worse, dangerous!
31
Nombre
@ROBOdell4thewin
We should put a moratorium on killing people until we determine all details about how and why this occurred, and until after someone is convicted and a congressional investigation and hearings are completed with plans to ensure it doesn't happen again.
52
Michael Wu Hunt
@michaelwuhunt
Just imagine if a SECDEF had gone AWOL for several days and the WH had no idea. Oh wait. Your faux outrage is noted David. Good lord.
6
Monitoring Spin
@monitoringspin
Goldberg left America to serve in a foreign military, you insufferable dimwit. He has zero loyalty to this country and would sell us out in an instant, if he hasn’t already.
Image
17