Post

Conversation

I actually can not OS this because of US export restrictions on drones with over 60 minutes endurance. It's an unreal timeline that a garage-built drone using a $300 3D printer is export restricted.
Quote
Tsung Xu
@tsungxu
Having no experience did not stop me from making a VTOL with world-class range and flight time, all in 90 days. This is the thing I'm most proud of building to date!
0:03 / 3:03
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

There's been so much interest in open sourcing the designs and print files for this. I would have loved to have seen how far people could have pushed the endurance on this or slightly modified designs. I suspect 5 hours+ would have been very achievable
I suspect many of the asks I had to open source where in geos with ongoing conflict or tension. My video was even featured on a niche Russian blog.
Image
And to be super clear, I never shared any CAD files or print files with anyone. If an aerospace engineer with some UAV experience was motivated enough, they could build something better themselves, with even longer range.
Really appreciate this sentiment. Companies already are going all in on 3D printed airframes like Firestorm for defense. Think we'll see some for drone delivery soon using short chopped carbon reinforced filaments - fyi
Quote
R3PL1C8R Drones
@R3PL1C8R
Replying to @tsungxu
Entire companies could have been started w/ your design as their foundation. But No. Even if there is some narrow legal path (and I think there is), it’s not worth the risk to you. They should make an easy way to legally share info with other US drone interests. China does this.
There's other point with the legal grey area David mentions. This VTOL had been shared a lot more than I expected. It's been picked up by 3D Printing Industry, Yahoo, MSN, Tom's Hardware, XDA, German, Japanese, Korean, Robotics Newsletters and many others. If I had done a
kids don't do this at home
Quote
Denny
@dennythedev
Replying to @tsungxu
> be Tsung Xu > learn and build a VTOL in 90 days > open source it > go to jail for violating national security Crazy time to be alive
I feel like this, along with the 250g FAA limit, are a double-edged sword in that effectively, civilian experimentation and innovation in drones is regulatorially prevented in the US. It can easily be seen that civilian use drones in other countries have been critical to the
Yes this is fair, though I can see the challenges because of the capability that you, I or any builder could have with some motivation and time to build a long range drone. Not sure what the middle ground is here tbh. But countries can be proactive in engaging with the
Square profile picture
Shipping items to Amazon takes way too much time & headache Until today. Boxem saves you hours with streamlined Amazon shipments & analytics Plus features like 2D barcodes make your business more profit Get a free trial & start making money on Amazon faster today
Quote
Tsung Xu
@tsungxu
Replying to @OriflammeTech
BIS Commerce Control List 9A012 a.2 bis.doc.gov/index.php/docu a good overview here jrupprechtlaw.com/drone-export-c
Grey area, implications of the platforms end use plays a huge role, generally you should be fine but this is not legal advice. But technically if that rule was enforced, there's tons of projects/products that would be export restricted which are not.
Yes, though any shade of grey is not worth the risk though. Soon homebuilt multicopters will all be exceeding 60 minutes as well
> be Tsung Xu > learn and build a VTOL in 90 days > open source it > go to jail for violating national security Crazy time to be alive
if that was the only change, way too many legal headaches to have zero risk of legal issues if actually changing airframe design, that's too much of a lift for the CAD equivalent of spaghetti code!
This is why the US is behind. Ridiculous restrictions making it illegal to do anything. You need to make sure non-citizens don't have any access, but then the gov sues you if you "won't hire" non-citizens. You are more likely to go to jail making drones than you are to get rich.
Yeah we should make it easier for grassroots innovation without fear of legal ramifications
Centauri Carbon is even more OP for the price with 320 deg hotend, though idk about their experience and ease of use
Quote
Tsung Xu
@tsungxu
Replying to @coenhyde
if that was the only change, way too many legal headaches to have zero risk of legal issues if actually changing airframe design, that's too much of a lift for the CAD equivalent of spaghetti code!
Technically, almost all drones and definitely all of the stuff that rctestflight builds falls under some clauses for "guided weapons", due to range and controls.
Very cool and congrats. Have you experimented with payloads and how much the weight affects the total flight time? You could open source the plans specifically for a payload that has a certain weight to sag the total flight time to less than 60 minutes. Little work around 🤙🏻
That would still make the print files available which is no bueno. Mo and the Titan Dynamics team also does great kits
As many commenters stated, you should release this work, start a crowdfunding campaign with 0 guarantees to supporters, use that money to hire a lawyer and they will tell you what you can and can't release.
Just replace the battery with a much smaller one and open-source the version with 30 minutes of endurance.
No way this is prima facie restricted -- endurance/range surely depend on myriad factors beyond the airframe
Can you send it to me? I am an American and I just want to build one lol
perhaps you could open source one that doesnt have a $1300 battery in it
What the fuck, watched the video yesterday and was impressed with the design. Hoped for some fusion/cad files, but I guess not. Stay safe
You can’t export the physical drone. You can post the documentation online for free on a forum. We then have the free ability to access that forum for that information.
Square profile picture
Shipping items to Amazon takes way too much time & headache Until today. Boxem saves you hours with streamlined Amazon shipments & analytics Plus features like 2D barcodes make your business more profit Get a free trial & start making money on Amazon faster today
It's your choice to publish your design or not but you should be covered by Bernstein vs United States if all you do is post drawings, specifications, CAD etc
Which restriction? Open source projects aren't covered by EAR as long as the distribution meets the standard of being a "published work" The only tech I'm aware of that individuals are not allowed to freely research and disseminate is nuclear weapons ("born classified")
For ESC heat dissipation, consider using the airframe for passive cooling in the future. Even with a carbon fiber frame, parts of the airframe exposed to airflow can be made of metal. However, this approach may be counterproductive in certain applications.
If I had the time, I'd certainly design the model aircraft and open-source it. I'm sure I'll have plenty of time in the summer to. I'll make sure to include the electronics as well
Still very cool. I saw a short video of a guy who strapped a lightweight Super 8 camera to his racing drone with a wide angle lens for some dream-like aerial shots.
Basically see the censored distribution of things right on the export limit. Like with a missiles and rockets, always just short of MTCR…
Quote
Hoffman Tactical
@HoffmanTactical
Replying to @tsungxu
We open source weapons and firearms parts all the time, there is a supreme court case that covered the matter with some support. Its a 1A issue.
Just post the 50 minutes endurance platform and let everyone else make the logical upgrades?
How much of the flight endurance is the plane design and how much of it is your use of an extremely expensive, top of the line battery?
How would this cause an export restriction? There are plenty of plans out their (and build lists, and frames all over) to achieve over 60 minutes with a standard fixed wing w/ or w/o a flight controller for the past decade.
Just make it use a smaller battery and a lead weight the size and weight of another object as a "counterweight"
This mindset only works in a world where USA is the leader. Because meanwhile chine sells you even cranes on AliExpress. God bless china.
Drone export control is a losing battle. We don’t make most of the components for sUAS, you can’t stop that R&D from being done overseas where the components are made. It’s not much better than the USA telling people don’t make drones.
Just publish it as a book. The First Amendment allows you to circumvent inane export restrictions like that.
Image
This Post was deleted by the Post author. Learn more
don't think so, and don't have the time to look into it. Not remotely worth taking the legal risk