Everyone's afraid of the bond market: the conservative justices insert a "don't worry, we're not going to blow up the Fed" note in a shadow docket order in a case not involving the Fed. supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf
Post
Conversation
![David Watson 🥑](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="96" height="96"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Post your reply
So where exactly in the Constitutional text, does this justification for The Fed's unique position exist?
Looks like the Justices made it up out of thin air.
So dumb.
My "I'm not going to destroy the US economy" t-shirt is raising a lot of questions answered by my shirt.
This is so stupid, as if they would rule he couldn’t fire a FRB President or BOG governor if it came to them.
Textualism is not a philosophy. It's a trick of the trade.
He wants to crash the economy, he said so in 2014. Think who would profit from the chaos.
Very odd they mentioned the Fed in this stay order.
But also very reassuring.
Our founders weren't a monolith
Some of them did believe that an independent body can exist within the executive branch.
Supreme Court playing 4D chess with financial markets like a nervous teenager trying to look cool 
But you see there's a distinct historical tradition aka we only want to politicize the NRLB and FTC.
Yeah, that little footnote about the Fed is nakedly intellectually dishonest. It lays bare the political motivation about the entire unitary executive campaign: there is NO logical reason the Fed remains independent under the unitary exec theory. It’s all political.
Explore how Bitcoin transcends gold as a safeguard against inflation and central bank policies. ‘Bitcoin Nation’ delves into the essence of sound money, offering insights into financial sovereignty and the limitations of fiat systems. Discover why Bitcoin is superior to gold.
