Post

Conversation

the “free tibet” movement is a weird case study. used to be huge, now functionally doesnt exist. tibet is not even used against china rhetorically. meanwhile the popular perception of china “taking over” tibet is them annexing some tiny random place. look how big it actually is:
Image
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

as an example, it was so well known that googling “free tibet simpsons” brings up at least five different things (theres really more). most people now have probably never even seen a free tibet sticker or sign in real life. just totally left the public mind after full saturation
Image
from a neutral point of view, if you were china at the height of the free tibet movement, fast forwarding to now, you really got a best case scenario. you got it all: nothing changed, no one thinks about it, no one brings it up - an extremely interesting total informational win.
Image
its an interesting thing to honestly go into because a lot of it has to do with the rise of the modern nation state, complex political dominion claims, and so on. im oddly familiar with “both sides” but ultimately it only relates to topics i know intimately via art and religion.
Quote
William Magoffin
@MagoffinWilliam
Replying to @owenbroadcast
That map is of what Tibet historically claims, what they actually had in 1951 is another matter (not taking sides). The whole Free Tibet thing started in the 80's after the PRC fell more in to the Western sphere with the West arming them to become a counter to the USSR.
Show more
This is almost entirely because of Hollywood. China was totally closed to Hollywood films until 1994. By 1997 the studios were moving to self-censor and movies like Tomorrow Never Dies were full of "China is our friend" themes. Tibet was already on its way out of consciousness.
It’s similar to Kurds in Eastern Turkey. The population has been assimilated to an extent that there isn’t enough local energy to support a global movement. Nobody in Tibet is helping the “Free Tibet” movement, so what are you going to do?
The Free Tibet stuff used to be huge on college campuses 20 years ago I remember reading about the abuse and forced subservience in mainstream publications at the time, now you’re hard pressed to find anyone who’s even heard of it whose under 30
Went to the SF Tibetan Freedom Concert in '96. Many of these bands still tour, none will say a single word about Tibet or China human rights.
Image
This is because the people that decide what the progressives’ current thing is have China’s best interests in mind
Tibet does not deserve freedom they were like every libtard stereotype about a medieval tyrant except its okay because they're Buddhist I guess. Legit hundreds of thousands of slaves serving the lhamas
theoretically open to something like this but part of me feels strongly that, for health reasons, the earth should have at least one kingdom on it that chooses an infant leader via divination.
There's the Falun Gong too, and now you have the Uhigurs. There's always some handy oppressed peoples in western China. In ten years, the Tajiks will get their due
Map gamers understand it takes around 50 years to add a place to your core provinces after annexation. Near the fifty year point, there was one last attempt to bring interest to it/raise a rebellion. Now it's too late, and the game goes on.
There used to be banners and graffiti in the early 90s. All long gone now, and the Lefties have a faux-history about that conquest as fake as their account of the history of Palestine
Because people realised it made no sense. Tibet has the population density of a desert, no economy, no infrastructure, no history of independence (only autonomy, it was already legally Chinese before the CCP takeover) and its historical form of government is a feudal theocracy.
Because they lost. Everyone wants to be seen as backing the underdog. But no one wants to be seen as having backed a loser. So it just fades out.
My state (Virginia) still has a Friends of Tibet license plate option that supports a Tibetan charity. That’s the most I see of the “Free Tibet” movement nowadays.
Image
Many protests from Hollywood types about Freeing Tibet. Too bad China's power had just started, so almost all of them no longer had work.
This would be Palestine in 10-20 years if Israel didn’t strike back after October 7th and instead posed itself as a victim. The retaliation will have been a mistake long term
To be honest, China is just waiting on the Dali Lama to die. His movement is so fractioned it will become irrelevant after he’s gone.
You know what would have freed Tibet? Good old-bashioned back-room-deal arms shipments just like Reagan used to make. Not the way Obama/Hillary/McCain made. Those idiots should have just used bumper stickers, "Free Libya!"
There are people who still care, but yeah, its a movement that basically doesn't exist anymore. Mostly because they've been drowned out for decades, nowadays you get some new shit every so often, Ukraine, Gaza, etc. because the idiots move on. But Tibet is an example of what will
Show more
That map is of what Tibet historically claims, what they actually had in 1951 is another matter (not taking sides). The whole Free Tibet thing started in the 80's after the PRC fell more in to the Western sphere with the West arming them to become a counter to the USSR.
People talk a lot about how much the right has changed, but the left has changed even more. You sometimes meet a leftist who still holds these views and you can at least have a conversation with them. This was from the a time when the left didn't worship the Intelligence Agencies