Post

Conversation

Click to Subscribe to Noahpinion
So much ink spilled over unrealized capital gains taxes when the boring obvious normie idea of just ending the step-up basis is sitting right there, largely ignored.
Quote
dylan matthews 🔸
@dylanmatt
Replying to @dylanmatt
The normie alternative is to just end step-up in basis.
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

I would find it totally fine to do a 50% estate tax for anything over 10M I would get behind + end stepped up basis. In this post-woke "you need to work to get your money" world, ending rich people welfare (aka inheritance) should be a priority.
Progressives will never support increased inheritance taxes. They are relying on Mom and Dad's house to fund their great novel.
You could do this going forward, but people have not been keeping their cost basis records. What did grandma pay for that GE stock back in the 70s?
Capital appreciation distorts the economy. A business should have earnings and distribute those earnings to its owners. Otherwise, what is its purpose?
Biggest tax loophole, money-wise. I advise elderly clients all the time to not sell highly-appreciated assets as they will pass tax free to the next generation. If they eliminated it, there would be an avalanche of tax revenue.
To be fair, the Biden budget plan endorsed by Harris does also mention eliminating the step-up basis. Better oversight on valuation r.e. step-up would more reasonable too. It’s common to artificially inflate valuations on alt/illiquid assets to avoid capital gains later.
Quote
Max Schatzow
@AdviserCounsel
Replying to @AdviserCounsel
Stepped up basis? Simply dying eliminates taxes owed on assets with built in gains. Someone is getting an asset for free. Why isn’t it taxed?
Better solution for a dynamic economy is to eliminate income taxes altogether and move a consumption tax. There is zero surface area for gaming and govt cannot dole out special perks. Just exclude groceries.
Sounds good. Estate taxes and no step up. Now, please tell them to remove this horrible, terrible, stupid taxing unrealized gains idea from the blob-borg brain before someone gets hurt.
My understanding is what politicians & wonks are mad about is >1b wealth individuals borrowing against their unrealized gains to use as living expenses while not recording any "income" for tax purposes In which case unrealized gains taxes are a hammer when a scalpel is needed
I struggle to wrap my head around this stuff...is there a basic explainer out there that you or someone else has? I have conflicting views on this. I don't think taxing unrealized capital is a good idea, but I also don't have sympathy for people that have $100 million+...
What these proposals never seem to address is the effect of the forced selloff on the price of the stock and on the market at large, and (even more importantly) who is going to be buying all of that stock (and with what money).
Also requires closing various loopholes where property can be maintained in trusts and insurance wrappers and still never realized even at death, but in principle would be reasonable alternative.
So much ink spilled in the thread and it doesn’t cover the core arguments against unrealized taxation, it assumes valuations only go up and that the market is always rational. Taxing unrealized gains is a great way to turn the next stock bubble into the next Great Depression.
It's worth nothing that this seemingly innocuous proposal would be, effectively, a near doubling of the estate tax up to 70% or so.
Canada has realization @ death & it doesn't work. They still have extensive lock-in & raise little revenue bc it's easy to beat deemed realization with "freeze" transactions. Talk to some lawyers.
The affluent kids from fancy colleges who are struggle to afford their desired lifestyle in the big city want “billionaires” to pay for some of their expenses (eg, free transit, free healthcare, etc.) but don’t want to jeopardize their own upper middle class inheritance.
List A, those against unrealized gains proposal. List B, those against ending stepped-up basis. Assess relative abilities of A & B to make members miserable. For those on both lists, give them a Sophie's Choice, see which they'd surrender. Do the math: Which is most passable?
Exactly! Even Bill Ackman said to just tax the personal loans. There are keyhole solutions to this problem that don't involve nuking venture capital.
Why not just do a Federal sales tax with maybe a couple exemptions (groceries, etc.)? Promotes investment, but if billionaires wanted to piss away their money on lavish expenditures, Uncle Sam gets its cut.
Am I wrong in thinking that some of America's fiscal problems could be solved by taking the US Navy's 4th fleet on a little Caribbean tour threatening to flatten the capitals of small island nations if they don't enforce taxes on financial transactions?
Image
For context, the annual revenue loss due to the step-up in basis is generally estimated to be between $40 billion and $50 billion per year.
You can end basis step up for 50 years and have a loophole for it for 1 (as there was 15 years or so back) and have accomplished nothing. Old money is patient.
Then we’d hear complaining about poor inheritors whose millionaire parents didn’t keep good records on their holdings
And make borrowing cash against certain categories of appreciated assets be a realization event, for ultra high net worth individuals.
Large, untaxed unrealized gains are only problematic with step-up basis give-away. I’m curious what social purpose the step-up on tradable assets provides. I understand (but don’t agree with) the rationale for step-up on eg an illiquid family business/farm.
It’s so much less costly and clean to administer. And once you remove the idea that “it never gets taxed” because assets can just step-up basis through multiple generations, I think you would see more dispositions well before death.
And a wealth tax on unrealized gains is never going to be politically tenable anyway. Estate taxes aren’t really that controversial! Especially if you put a high bar before they kick in like $25 million indexed to inflation. Or the ending the step up basis. All viable.
Also, lot of people fret over the idea of a wealth tax as they pay "wealth taxes" to their investment firms.
My home state of WA starts death tax at 2.2M. Help explains, in part, why founder of Amazon Jeff Bezos moved to FL. The wealthy will always tax arbitrage. Also tax was tried & failed in Europe.
Image
Forget all that. Time to tax ALL unrealized gains - stock portfolios, private and public corporations, stock options, EVERYTHING. Right now it's just on real estate, time to turn the tables on the wealthy Yimby elites and start taxing THEM on their unrealized gains on everything.
Not ignored by those with eyes to see.
Quote
Romain Lacombe
@rlacombe
Replying to @dsiroker
Just get rid of the step up in basis. Simpler and more fair.
Few people know of stepped up basis. Rich people do, but they aren’t rushing to tell poor people they are going to get the biggest tax break imaginable.
The cap gains thing is unrealistic. It’s for show. Stepped up basis is realistic which makes it scary and therefore unsuitable as part of candidate’s platform.
That one especially hits the middle class. How many people inheriting a 50-year-old house know the actual basis, including the costs of all the improvements their parents made? Meanwhile the rich have accountants and know the basis of everything.
Inheritance taxes are not fair, you have paid income tax all along the way on that income, you should own it and be able to do whatever you want with it, giving it to children or etc. To me this just seems like jealousy of rich people, like they have no right to what they made.
Same with student loan bankruptcies vs. forgiveness. It would be nice if one day we could see the actual debate in the public sphere rather than a bunch of primates throwing poop at each other.
What is the policy reason for the step up in basis at death? You don't want to pay Cap Gains AND Inheritance Tax / Estate Tax? Is that the idea? But if Estate Tax basically doesn't exist anymore... so what?
Even better: a lookback charge that adjust capital gains tax rates based on how long the asset was held. That has the same effect without presenting any liquidity problems
No, it isn’t. The normie position is never “tax me more.” The normie position is stop blowing money like a drunken sailor (“we need higher taxes because it’s important to hand out money to college graduates and South Americans pretending to seek asylum.”)
How about this - people die- so billionaires untaxed and unrealized gains get taxed when they die, at 50%, which is in part why they give their fortunes away.
I’m about to revoke your economist card. Anyone that says we should end step up basis without mentioning the estate tax doesn’t understand the subject.
Yeah, I don’t get it. Matthews says as much, but then tries to pooh pooh it as being “administratively complex” and not raising cash fast enough. It’s about as straightforward as you can get, and opens no new cans of worms. FFS.
eliminate step up but keep estate tax? you die w 100e6 mostly gain heirs sell 100e6, pay 40e6 tax for gain. now they pay estate tax 40e6. 20e6 (20%) remaining. I can see if you under estate limit (13e6) you pay 0 estate n no gain. But remember this is sold as >1006 case
Why give the UHNW a fair option? Their brazen avoidance of tax code’s intent shouldn’t be met with something fair and reasonable. If they didn’t want unrealized taxation on the table, they shouldn’t have unilaterally used the buy borrow die scheme. So why play nice? UHNW wont
Families are overtaxed as it is. Plainly put, I and many others oppose any increase of taxes. People need to stop feeling entitled to spend the money of others.
Nah Kamala knows what she's doing. She'll push it and push it until in 2025 patriotic saviors Senator Brown and Tester gut the unrealized capital gains tax. National heroes. Then just pass whatever tax bill you actually want.