Post

Conversation

Multiple lines of evidence are converging on the idea that viruses you picked up decades ago might quietly be driving age-related diseases. We've known for a few years that EBV raises MS risk 32-fold, and that molecular mimicry between an EBV protein and nerve insulation likely triggers brain autoimmunity. What remained unclear was why some people persistently carry EBV and others don't. A new paper in from the (whose lab has been supported by ) and labs answers that at population scale. They mined ~735,000 human genomes for traces of Epstein-Barr virus, using reads of viral genomes that existing pipelines were throwing out as junk, and found that ~10% of people carry detectable EBV DNA in blood. Carrying persistent EBV is associated with variable antigen processing, and the broader genetic architecture of viral persistence shares a component with lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, and type 1 diabetes. Meanwhile, a separate line of very recent evidence is also pointing in that direction. The shingles vaccine, targeting another persistent herpesvirus, is showing ~20% dementia risk reduction in quasi-randomized studies which has been replicated across multiple countries. There seems to be more at the intersection of immunity and age-related disease than we initially thought.
Image
David Watson 🥑
Post your reply

Quote
Norn Group
@NornGroup
Infectious disease and aging research tend to be funded separately, which means work like this often falls between categories. This is part of why the next round of @impetusgrants includes a focused call on infectious disease and aging. Contact us to support it. Link below x.com/norngroup/stat…
Fascinating work. The 32-fold MS risk from EBV + 10% population carrier rate + 20% dementia reduction from shingles vaccine = a clear pattern. Key implications: 1) Viral persistence screening could stratify aging risk 2) Herpesvirus vaccines may have broader neuroprotective
so does this imply or direct that people should take antivirals regularly, or yearly? If so, which ones would perhaps make the most sense?
This is exactly why longitudinal datasets matter causal signals often hide in decades-long lag effects that cross-sectional studies miss. The competitive edge in health and workforce intelligence alike comes from tracking exposures, behaviors, and outcomes over time rather than
Some context on the herpesvirus part: the decrease in dementia risk with the specific shingles vaccine (and also seen in a RSV vaccine) appears due to the adjuvant used
I have been supporting this hypothesis for a long time now and one reason why I am so paranoid of the viral infections my kids wne thorough. Thanks for sharing!
This sounds like an assumption, but what is the benefit of this study to rheumatologists, endocrinologists, infectious disease specialists and geneticists nowadays? Just blame some virus for a disease that they can't cure or find the real cause of a disease?
Infections overactivate the integrated stress response causing a loss of protein production quality control Dormant viruses, especially rna viruses, reawakening are especially bad for it Causes dementias. Especially when hit in the head. Micro bleeds awakening dormant virus.
the EBV-MS link already changed how I think about viral exposure. if this holds broadly it means a lot of what we call aging is actually manageable chronic infection.