Sotomayor: 1. There is upside to her doing a strategically timed retirement 2. There is no downside 3. She is of the normal age for an American to retire 4. Everyone knows 1-3 5. Most Democrats in congress are pretending not to know this

Apr 11, 2024 · 12:36 AM UTC

It's fascinating and bizarre, but in a weird way typical of the extent to which the epistemological practices in Democratic Party politics have gotten wrecked by having all these discussions in public where nobody speaks honestly.
Replying to @mattyglesias
She’s got at least 15 years left. Pressuring her to retire now is insane, incredibly pessimistic and a serious display of weakness
Replying to @mattyglesias
I mean should we strive to have a bench full of 23 year old partisans or do we want experienced judges? Generally nobody talks about this because it’s a dumb idea…and any benefit to this gets canceled out by the oppo party doing the same thing…
Replying to @mattyglesias
If Justice Sotomayor actually likes her job at the pinnacle of her profession that could be a downside.
Replying to @mattyglesias
OTOH if she just delays it until November, Trump can choose her replacement.
Let's start of vigorous campaign of urging Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito to retire, instead.
Oh, and the downside is that you presuppose Republicans would cooperate with Biden on a replacement.
Replying to @mattyglesias
The strategic thing for Dems to do is to seek a deal with GOP. Justice Sotomayor retires if Justices Thomas, Alito and Roberts also agree to retire at the same time. GOP will buy it. I am positive.
Replying to @mattyglesias
here, let me relate by restating your bullets 1) There are only rewards 2) There is ZERO risk 3) I'm ageist 4) Join the bandwagon 5) I love congressional conspiracies As you can see, well thought out... (not) ** Only a child sees all reward and no risk
Replying to @mattyglesias
You guys get into the stupidest shit